Campaigners are calling for a change in a law that prevents many Scots victims of dementia from making simple decisions like buying a new pair of shoes.
The outdated law means that Alzheimer's victims whose financial and legal affairs have been handed over to a court-appointed curator cannot make even basic day-to-day decisions for themselves.
As a major Scottish conference on the degenerative illness opens in Glasgow today, urgent reforms to the current law are being called for. Campaigners want the Government to introduce more flexibility so that sufferers do not lose control of all their financial affairs because they need help with a major enterprise such as selling a home or business.
Lawyer David McClements, a key speaker at today's conference, explained: ''At present the law is black and white and it needs to be changed.
''If you are diagnosed as suffering from dementia and need help with a major financial or legal decision then you are seen as needing help with all these kinds of decisions.
''The law says that you can either make decisions or you can't and there is no grey area in between. Just because someone with dementia needs help with selling major assets doesn't mean they can't go out and choose and buy clothes.
''But the law doesn't allow for that. They have to go through their curator. He or she takes over and basically reduces the person's decision-making to nil, which is not helpful for the sufferer.''
According to Alzheimer's Scotland there are 60,000 Scots with the incurable illness, which destroys brain cells and affects the memory, and 12,000 new cases every year.
When their decision-making abilities become impaired, many have a curator appointed for them by the courts under the Judicial Factors Act, which dates back to the sixteenth century and was last revised in the 1920s.
Campaigners are lobbying the Government to introduce a new law based on a report and draft Bill, Incapable Adults, which was issued by the Scottish Law Commission in 1995.
They claim it would get rid of the ''all or nothing'' concept by introducing reforms to allow sufferers to handle the less complex aspects of their affairs.
Mr McClements, a partner in Russel and Aitken, based in Denny, near Stirling, said: ''From a legal point of view there is concern that the law is so rigid and takes away people's power to spend their own money.
''There was a case, for example, where the curator refused to hand over the money to a sufferer who wanted to buy a new piece of furniture because they didn't think it was suitable.
''There is no opportunity for the law to be discharged unless the person dies, which isn't much use, or they recover, which is not an option with Alzheimer's.''
Ms Jan Killeen of Alzheimer's Scotland Action on Dementia - which backs the Incapable Adults Bill - said: ''The current laws governing the way decisions are taken for adults with an incapacity due to dementia or a head injury are outdated and inappropriate.
''The proposed new Bill will provide a more modern framework for making decisions and make sure people have as much independence as possible.''
She added: ''It is distressing for sufferers to feel so powerless when they have no control over their money. It doesn't do them any good because they lose self- esteem and become withdrawn.''
Today's conference, organised by Alzheimer's Scotland, marks the start of Dementia Awareness Week. It is the first Scottish conference on the needs of people in the early stages of dementia. More than 200 professionals and carers are expected to attend.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article