PLANS to make Edinburgh the first city in the UK to ban dogs from public parks have been thrown out after massive public opposition, writes Raymond Duncan.
In the biggest consultation exercise undertaken in Scotland on the problem of dog fouling, the majority of the 1500 people who responded to a survey were against banning dogs from open areas, including Princes Street Gardens.
However, people do want owners who fail to clean up after their pets to be punished.
If the ban had been introduced, 29 parks throughout the city would have been affected.
The consultation was launched in December after rising concerns about the growing problem of dog fouling in city parks.
Dog campaigners were delighted at what they called a victory for common sense.
Spokeswoman Doreen Graham said they had made a number of recommendations to the council as alternatives to the ban.
The next step will be to ask the Government to change the law so that on-the-spot fines can be imposed on owners who do not clean up after their animals.
Officials will also be asked to initiate talks with the police and procurator-fiscal, and to re-designate the 29 parks in the questionnaire, making it an offence to allow dogs to foul designated land.
Discussions are also planned by the council with dog welfare organisations.
If there is no improvement, the matter will be reviewed in a year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article