I MUST imagine that the statements about Fidel Castro contained in John Macleod's article (May 26) stem from ignorance. Should John Macleod acquaint himself with the history of Cuba and of Fidel Castro he will find that he has grossly maligned a brave and honourable man.
Fidel Castro is alive today only because in 1953 an officer in Batista's militia disobeyed orders which he knew would have resulted in the murder of Castro and his immediate companions. Nevertheless several years later Castro returned to Cuba to lead the revolution which ended the brutal and corrupt Batista regime knowing that, if captured, he would most likely be tortured and killed, as indeed many were. These facts cannot be denied.
Some weeks ago, courtesy of Saga Holidays, my wife and I spent two weeks in Cuba during which we travelled the length of the island by bus, walked in various cities, and paid impromptu visits to shops, a small farm, and a school. In the two weeks of touring in Cuba I saw only one picture of Fidel Castro and that was on private property - none in any public place.
We found things exactly as described by your correspondent Bob Crampsey (May 10, 1997). Shortage of fuel for motor transport was glaringly obvious with thousands waiting for hours for transport to and from work. Otherwise my impression of life in Cuba was reminiscent of Britain in 1947. There is strict rationing of food and basic commodities. Everyone we saw was well-fed and clothed. No-one is starving in Cuba. The people in Cuba have in place health and education services of which they can be justly proud and are kindly, friendly and cheerful. Good luck to them!
John Stewart,
4 Larch Road, Glasgow.
May 28.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article