LABOUR'S new modernising army of MPs is proving to be more traditionalist than people realised, writes Ken Smith.
It was widely assumed the new intake would enthusiastically embrace high technology for voting at the House of Commons rather than the tired old method of trooping through the lobbies under the gaze of Whips and tellers.
However a survey released yesterday showed that 53% of MPs preferred to keep the current system.
The Modernisation Select Committee decided in the wake of the survey to drop proposals to switch to smart-card or even fingerprint voting.
Edinburgh Pentlands Labour MP Lynda Clark, a keen supporter of updating the Commons, said she was very disappointed with the result - particularly as nearly a third of the new intake did not bother taking part in the survey. She felt a number may simply have lost the voting form amongst the welter of paperwork which descends upon MPs. ''Despite the vote, my personal view is that this system still needs change in order to make it far more efficient.
''I actually don't accept that there is overwhelming support for the status quo, but obviously I have to accept the outcome,'' she commented. Ms Clark said she would still press for changes to be made.
The survey showed that the current system was the only one rated ''acceptable'' by more than half the MPs who responded.
Fingerprint readers were acceptable to almost half (49%), but 38% of MPs objected to the use of them in principle. All the other options, including using infra-red handsets, were considered unacceptable by at least half of MPs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article