BOOTS has been one of the best performing consumer stocks in the past five years, boasting the fourth strongest total shareholder return of all.
A business driven more by attention to cash than most in the face of recent acquisition activity, Boots will probably end the current year with substantial net balances.
It has a similar culture to Marks & Spencer in that it largely prefers to grow businesses using its in-house expertise.
It is quite symbolic that neither has done at all well with major takeovers outside their core activities.
Only now is the Halfords part of Boots beginning to look interesting in shareholders' eyes.
However, Boots' move into financial services does seem rather astute, even if it will always be a small part of the operation.
It is possible that within five years sales could be approaching #100m with a 30% gross margin and only a trifling carriage cost of providing forms and a little shelf space.
The strength and integrity of the brand name is worth a huge amount of promotional expense.
The biggest competitive concern comes from the supermarkets, with J Sainsbury now the dark horse in terms of providing the keenest challenges.
Boots seems to have turned its Advantage loyalty card into profit faster than its competitors and now has a base of more than eight million users. It is well able to fight its corner.
And in spite of the Far East's troubles, the City seems to be remarkably optimistic about Boots' prospects for Thailand. There the company is able to pick up sites cheaply in sterling terms and will begin to achieve critical mass with around 40 stores providing a solid platform for further Asian
expansion.
Reliance upon Japan should be carefully scrutinised as few British retailers have made chunky sums there in the past.
On the Charterhouse forecast of profits of #626m for this year, the shares are trading at 21 times likely earnings which looks high but the cash generation provides great reassurance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article