A SCOTS judge, who chairs the board of governors of a trust which was caught up in a major child sex abuse trial, yesterday claimed the staffing of its residential homes for children had undergone ''a transformation''.
Lord Osborne said in the past it had not been uncommon for staff to be unqualified but now people would not be employed without suitable qualifications.
''The standards of skills possessed by staff can be said to have substantially increased since the time of the abuse,'' he said.
Lord Osborne, chairman of the board of governors of the Dean and Cauvin Trust, was making submissions to the Edinburgh child protection inquiry. It is seeking to establish what lessons need to be learned after the jailing of two care assistants last December for a total of 27 years for abusing children in Lothian residential homes over two decades.
Lord Osborne, whose trust now operates two homes but no longer runs Dean House - which was involved in the trial - said a complaints procedure for residents which did not exist when its former care worker Brian McLennan was in position had now operated for some years.
The judge said the governing body was composed of people who did not have social work experience and it was fair to say depended heavily on its social work manager Caroline Chittelburgh and those in charge of the homes.
Ms Chittelburgh said at the inquiry, chaired by Professor Kathleen Marshall of Glasgow University, that she believed a national child care register for Scotland would be an advantage.
Detective Superintendent John McGowan, of Lothian and Borders police, told the inquiry of a ''sea change'' in the way police officers approached young people who came forward with sex abuse allegations.
He said such accusations were treated in a more understanding manner than in the 80s, when there were some claims that complainers were ''put through the hoops''.
Councillor Susan Dalgety, deputy leader of the City of Edinburgh Council, said there was a genuine commitment to ensure the best care for those young people in their responsibility.
''The results of the inquiry will be taken very seriously,'' she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article