silent cinema: World Cinema Before The Coming Of Sound
Joel W Finler
Batsford Film Books, #20
n LIKE no other art form that has ever existed, silent cinema is complete - or, as the philistines would say, finished. When the talkies took over, it was almost as though literature or music had been replaced overnight by some undreamed-of technical development that shared only its raw materials (words, notes, light) with its predecessor.
Add to that the poignant reflection that the whole life of the silents (1896-1928, RIP) took place within the lifetimes of people still alive today, and books like this take on an unavoidably antiquarian, almost necrological, air.
The great thing that Joel Finler understands, you see, is that the silents were not a primitive ancestor of the talkies - indeed, early talkies were technically and artistically far less sophisticated - but a whole different medium. He demonstrates what makes the silents so different, so appealing: their universality, their far from artless simplicity, and their ability to engage the audience's emotions in a way that was less ''realistic'' but also less artificial than the comparatively stilted and stylised gab-fests that replaced them. Another distinction he makes clear is that class distinctions between movies, from art-house to blockbuster, came in only when the actors started talking. Before, there were just good movies and bad, and the highbrows and the lowbrows (by and large) watched the same ones: silents were the last truly egalitarian art.
Lavishly illustrated with hundreds of rare and evocative stills, this is a fine biography of the only art ever to have been both midwived and buried by technology.
Kenneth Wright
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article