MUCH of what Michael Thain claims in his article, Home truths for a healthier nation (May 28), is true, and needed saying . There is inevitably a balance to be achieved between the claims of interventional medicine and social provision.
However, it is incorrect to state that ''We have the best health service in Europe and probably in the world''. Our level of health provision is substantially lower than virtually all comparable countries (our spending per head is only 25% of the USA's), and we have no reason to be complacent about this.
What could be argued is that our spending may be approaching the level at which the cost of further improvements outweighs the benefits which will result, but there can be little doubt that many countries surpass us in the outcomes of treatment (and in many the concept of waiting-lists is unknown).
It is apparent that people feel strongly about the level of care provided by the NHS, and also about the underlying ethos of equity of provision. I believe that most people would prefer that the service was maintained and improved. The finance for improvements in housing, education, and nutrition should surely be retrieved from less popular and worthy sources that health care. Should our attention not be given once again to our level of ''Defence'' spending?
William McCulloch,
17 Alder Road,
Glasgow.
May 28.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article