LABOUR's manifesto pledges on education included the unequivocal commitment that every child would be treated as an individual with individual needs and individual aspirations. The Tories, they tried to argue, had become obsessed with meaningless quantitative analysis which bore no relation to the educational challenges of raising standards in our schools.
Now, just over a year after taking office, we are told that parents' educational performance, achievements, and qualifications - mostly relating to the 1970s and 80s - are to be used in assessing classroom targets for their children aged 12 to 18.
This hare-brained scheme has already been rejected as unreliable by Government education advisers, but is now being resurrected in pilot project form by education chiefs in Edinburgh, where its principal proponent is Councillor Elizabeth Maginnis.
Her hope, it has been reported today, is that if the Edinburgh trial proved a success, the Scottish Office would come back to it and introduce it nationally. In addition to being education convener on Edinburgh Council, of course, she holds the influential position of education spokeswoman for the Labour-dominated Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, as well as being a member of the Scottish Office working party on targets.
How dare Labour suggest then that there is necessarily any link between the parents' educational qualifications and the appropriate targets for their children in today's schools (two decades on), or that they would provide valid indicators about a child's progress?
It begs the question what would happen in the case of the child who was the product, for example, of parents of whom one was a high-flying first-class Wrangler from the Cambridge Tripos, and the other someone who had no O-levels/grades at all!
Elizabeth J Smith,
Scottish Conservative
Spokesman on Education,
14 Links Place, Edinburgh.
June 1.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article