THE introduction of a voluntary scheme for labelling of beef has been condemned as a tax on butchers by Jim Laird, president of the National Federation of Meat & Food Traders.
Speaking at the English-based federation's annual conference in Durham, Laird attacked the creation of an ''industry within an industry'' - a bureaucracy for identification and traceability creating jobs and businesses which could only be ''parasites on the back of the meat industry''.
The voluntary scheme, a forerunner of European legislation which will make labelling compulsory from January 2000, would impose a tax on butchers, the cost of which would fall on the customer, he argued. For those involved in verifying details of age, origin or breed mentioned on labels the new scheme would be tantamount to a licence to print money.
''This is a tax on butchers through the back door, which is ultimately a tax on our customers,'' he said. ''Why should butchers have to pay hundreds or thousands of pounds to prove that what they said about their beef was true?''
Laird said butchers had played a major role in rebuilding the image of British beef and beef products.
However, there was still some way to go to restore the situation that existed before 1996.
He conceded proposals for the licensing of butcher shops could be an extension of the requirement for registration with a local authority.
Provided safeguards were written into the legislation, a licence could pull up sloppy firms by their bootstraps. The prospect of an annual licence fee of #100 per shop was not acceptable, he insisted.
Licensing was designed to ensure public health and should be financed from central funds.
He pointed out, however, that butchers were not the only source of food poisoning.
''What about caterers? What about domestic cooking. Why should butchers be singled out for licensing,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article