MANAGEMENT of Prestwick Airport has backed plans to turn an RAF airbase in London into a commercial airport in order to challenge the dominance of Heathrow, writes Ken Smith.
Owners of the Ayrshire airport yesterday told MPs on a Transport Select Committee that BAA, the owners of Heathrow, and British Airways had colluded to ''artificially fabricate'' the situation that most transatlantic flights from London left from Heathrow.
However, at the same time it was proving difficult for airline operators using regional airports such as Prestwick to get flights into Heathrow.
Prestwick, with airlines such as Ryanair, has been pioneering cheap flights to other London airports, but Prestwick's owners admit that this is not always convenient for travellers wishing to connect with international flights out of Heathrow.
It has already been forecast, for example, that British Airways' decision to switch Inverness flights from Heathrow to Gatwick will lose the Highlands half the current number of Japanese visitors, some of whom spend up to #16,000 on visits to sporting estates.
Prestwick's solution, as told to the Select Committee yesterday, is to push for RAF Northolt, often the scene of private flights by Royal Family members and Prime Ministers, to become a civil airport with slots reserved for military and VIP traffic.
The airport describes the potential benefit of Northolt as ''substantial'' - largely because of its proximity to Heathrow. It envisages Northolt as a satellite to Heathrow with a reserved lane on a spur road to speedily transport passengers to connecting flights at Heathrow.
The Select Committee is investigating the economic benefits of air services from regional airports, and the consequences of Heathrow's dominance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article