MICHAEL Portillo's political comeback in the wake of his admission to a gay past suffered a major jolt last night when his former homosexual lover - allegedly of eight years - came forward and denounced the former Tory Defence Secretary as a hypocrite.
Mr Nigel Hart explained that their relationship turned frosty when in 1994 Mr Portillo voted in the Commons against lowering the age of gay sex to 16.
It was in 1972 that the two men are reported to have begun their sexual affair. Since at the time, the age of consent for homosexuals was then 21, the act was technically illegal as Mr Portillo was 19 at the time.
Mr Hart said that in 1994 he wrote to his former lover, accusing him of hypocrisy and selfishness, but never received a reply.
The letter reportedly said: ''If the course of your life in your 20s was publicly known, it would be inconceivable that you could become Prime Minister. I doubt you could even stay in politics.''
However, Mr Hart said he had asked his lover during their affair if being gay would harm his political career. He claimed that Mr Portillo replied: ''The time will come when no-one will care.''
The new claims could do serious damage to the former Enfield Southgate MP's bid to become the Conservative Party's candidate and thereafter their MP for the true blue constituency of Kensington and Chelsea.
Firstly, Mr Portillo's admission to having had ''homosexual experiences'' in his youth understates a gay relationship in the 1970s that allegedly lasted eight years.
Secondly, the charge of hypocrisy: coming as it does from his former gay lover, this will in some people's eyes add weight to the charge. This could be far more damaging to Mr Portillo's credibility than the revelations themselves.
In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, Mr Hart said he and the young Portillo had sex in Cambridge, London and abroad during their on-off affair.
They had met in December, 1971, at a gay party held by a London University don when Mr Portillo was an 18-year-old schoolboy, said Mr Hart.
Mr Hart recalled: ''There was a lot of flirting at the party. The men were calling Michael ''Polly''. We flirted together and he seemed to find me attractive.''
But it was not until a year later that they consummated their relationship at Mr Portillo's rooms in Cambridge University's Peterhouse College, said Mr Hart.
''I felt he had other homosexual affairs. He wasn't experienced but he wasn't nervous. Sex was fun, but it was nothing remarkable,'' insisted Mr Hart.
The Cambridge graduate also said the pair had enjoyed sex together in a west London flat while Mr Portillo's girlfriend, Carolyn, lived upstairs.
However, he said she had known about their gay relationship.
He said Mr Portillo had found the idea of his two lovers living in the same building ''amusing''.
He had once turned round in the company of both and said: ''I've just worked out that the first time I slept with you was the day after I slept with Carolyn for the first time.''
Mr Hart said their relationship ended when Mr Portillo got engaged to Carolyn, but they remained good friends for many years and he had even stayed with them for six months in 1983 when his business collapsed.
Yesterday, Shadow Home Secretary Ann Widdecombe told GMTV that, while she believed homosexuality was wrong, she supported Mr Portillo's political comeback.
Meanwhile, two polls showed large majority backing for Mr Portillo's action in revealing his gay past.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article