Fresh light was cast yesterday on the EU's internal battles during the Gulf War by Tory ex-Defence Minister Sir Archie Hamilton.
He said the row between Belgium and the last Government over its attempts to buy some ammunition for the Army in January 1991 was a warning to Labour ministers against trying to build a European defence identity.
He revealed that Belgium was so concerned by tabloid outrage sparked by its refusal to sell Britain the ammunition that its defence minister tried to involve the then Defence Secretary, Tom King, in a ploy to get the British Press off his back.
The Belgians wanted Mr King to send them a telegram, for disclosure to the media, thanking them for sending the ammunition before any had been delivered, Sir Archie told MPs during a Commons debate on the armed forces.
But the Defence Secretary was not ''born yesterday'' and refused so the ammunition never arrived, Sir Archie told MPs.
In general, the support offered by Britain's EU partners during the war against Iraq was ''absolutely dismal'', he claimed. Later, he said: ''We probably got more flying hours out of the Canadians than any of our European partners.''
Recalling the events of 1990-91, Sir Archie said: ''We all know about the Belgians, who had extreme difficulty with their coalition government and wouldn't even sell Defence Secretary Tom King the .155 ammunition which he needed at the time.
''The Belgian defence minister sent Tom a telegram saying, `Will you please, because I am under a bit of pressure from all these British newspapers' - that were slagging the Belgians off for not being very helpful about this war - `Will you send me a telegram saying thank you very much for all the ammunition. I'll send all the ammunition along later but if you just actually thank me for it in advance we'd be extremely grateful.'
''Tom wasn't born yesterday - he didn't send the note to the Belgian defence minister and the ammunition never arrived.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article