THOUGH a Mark Knopfler solo show has to deal extensively with his role as leader of Dire Straits, it soon becomes apparent why he has decided to
pursue a solo career, despite it being, in most respects, a technicality. The final, stadium-packing incarnation of Dire Straits was Knoplfler and a number of hired hands, some of whom remain in his band.
There is also considerable overlap in content with the tour which accompanied the final Dire Straits' album, On Every Street, but gone is the bluster, the power and pomposity. This compares favourably if only for its intimacy and restrained tastefulness, qualities which were not abundant at the end of the band's lifespan.
The set is split about equally between Dire Straits' songs and selections from Knopfler's second solo album, Sailing to Philadelphia. It is surprisingly easy to see the stylistic connection between early compositions like Romeo and Juliet and, for example, last year's Speedway At Nazareth or Prairie Wedding. It is considered, narrative songwriting as a platform for some adept guitar-playing.
However, the great failings of Dire Straits still run as fault lines through Knopfler's solo work. There is an abject lack of passion: even Sultans of Swing - still his best song - now seems less like a manifesto, more a blurred third-party observation.
At best, Knopfler is an uneasy communicator, and the outcome is a feeling of emptiness and uncertainty about both his music and introductions. It may be possible to like this, but it is hard, for all its apparent perfection, to imagine anyone being genuinely moved by it.
The nature of both performers and response is highlighted when one isolated person in the stalls dares to stand up during the rendition of Money for Nothing. It is a tellingly lukewarm response to a worthy but soulless performance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article