EVEN as the free world, including former wartime foes Germany, Japan, and Italy, mourned the 1965 death of Sir Winston Churchill, the Irish would neither forgive nor forget, according to secret Foreign Office papers newly released at the Public Record Office, Kew.
Arguably the resentment demonstrated towards the UK by Eamon De Valera, then president of the Republic, left wounds in the relationship between the two nations that only now are beginning to heal. De Valera and Sean Lemass, the then taoiseach, chose to snub Churchill's state funeral at St Paul's, even though Ludwig Erhard, the West German chancellor, made a point of being present.
There were loud voices in southern Ireland saying that, had De Valera chosen to travel to London, it would have been a ''very gracious act of reconciliation''. But De Valera would have nothing to do with it. Ireland was represented at the funeral by Frank Aitken, foreign minister, and its ambassador to London.
In public, De Valera had paid grudging tribute to the British wartime leader. ''Sir Winston was a great Englishman, one of the greatest in his time, a tower of strength to his own people and to their allies and for this he will be acclaimed in their hour of need. But we in Ireland had to regard Sir Winston over a long period as a dangerous adversary,'' he had said.
In private, De Valera sent a personal message of condolence to Lady Churchill. But De Valera's likely response to being invited to Churchill's funeral was predicted three years earlier.
Secret 1962 Commonwealth Relations office papers inquired whether De Valera would consider it a friendly gesture if he was invited to Churchill's funeral, when the time came.
Sir Ian Maclennan, the UK's then ambassador in Dublin, predicted that De Valera might just forgive Churchill over his role in the 1921 treaty that led to the partition of Ireland.
It was also revealed yesterday that as it would have been be too dangerous, and undignified, for the Queen to attend the 1971 extravaganza planned by the Shah of Iran to mark his dynasty's 2500th anniversary, the Foreign Office put pressure on a youthful Prince Charles to take her place. However, the 22-year-old put his foot down, and insisted it was more important he carried on with his studies as a potential naval officer at Dartmouth college.
The three-day party organised by the last Shah of Iran cost an estimated (pounds) 142m. It included 165 French chefs serving a ton of caviar to thousands of foreign dignitaries. At the time, vast areas of Iran were stricken with famine, and the sheer extravagance of the affair was the first shot in bringing to an end the Shah's dynasty.
Having concluded that the Queen could not possibly attend the festivities amid the ancient ruins of Persepolis, the Foreign Office suggested that this would be an ''interesting and novel'' experience for Prince Charles.
Despite the pressure put on him from officials who reckoned his absence would be seen as a snub to the Shah which might affect the UK's oil interests in the region, he stood by his guns. The Duke of Edinburgh and Princess Anne attended the celebrations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article