Campaigner who blew whistle on HIDB scandal
PHIL Durham, who died last week at the age of 80, survived for only about two weeks after the publication of his book Highland Whistle Blower.
The successful publication of his account of what became known as the Durham affair prompted him to contemplate his own demise with the comment: ''I'll die a relieved man. I will depart satisfied.''
Durham had been a lifelong campaigner. The fact that he had to use a wheelchair, the legacy from contracting polio at the age of 26, did not deter him from travelling widely throughout the Highlands to support whatever cause he had decided to espouse.
His cause celebre - the Durham affair - dates back to the 1960s when the Highlands and Islands Development Board was the bright hope for bringing jobs, enterprise, and an economic future to communities in the north and west Highlands.
Phil Durham was at that time a junior (and part-time) employee of the HIDB. He adopted the whistle-blower role over the activities of Frank Thomson, a flamboyant businessman and HIDB board member.
Thomson had business interests in Invergordon, including the largest grain distillery in Europe. He was also an enthusiastic proponent of an ambitious scheme to establish a petrochemical project near the town.
Durham flagged up the perceived conflict of interest to the then Scottish Secretary Willie Ross. When that provoked no response he copied his memo to the Times. The Times investigation led to a top-level meeting between its then editor, William Rees-Mogg, and a senior member of the HIDB. The following day Durham was sacked. He had been, he felt, betrayed.
Durham insisted that the publication of his book, which details the incident and the subsequent controversy, was not an act of revenge. ''I just needed to set the record straight. I could only do that when the official papers were released.
''What should you do if you discover that the quasi-government body for whom you work is paying the substantial research and development costs for a possible foreign-owned multimillion-dollar petro-chemical complex promoted
by the private company of one of its members, which could profit hugely should it proceed but need not repay any of its costs should it not?''
Durham pointed out that his wife's family, as local farmers, had stood to make a considerable financial gain if the project went ahead and their land was bought out.
Even without the HIDB experience, Durham had a fuller life than most. He was 18 when the Second World War broke out and he joined the Royal Navy. He was a dashing, bearded submarine officer before polio struck. His wartime experiences, including the capture of a German U-boat, were chronicled in his 1996 book The Fuhrer Led But We Overtook Him. A plaque from the captured U-boat, which was sailed in triumph up the Thames and under London Bridge, was a treasured souvenir in the Durham household at Scotsburn in the Easter Ross hills.
After his dismissal from the HIDB, Phil Durham and his wife Jane ran the 1300-acre livestock farm at Scotsburn. Jane was killed in a road accident in 1977 and the farm was handed over to their son, Richard. Phil then took command of the Citizens' Advice Bureau branches in Ross-shire. With that came the opportunity to put much of his previous experience of building a case to good use as he represented members of the public at employment tribunals and
other forums.
When a drinks party was held at Scotsburn last month to mark the publication of his whistleblower book, he confessed: ''I am pretty feeble and really I am not long for this world.''
HIghland Whistle Blower: The True Story of the Phil Durham Affair is published by Northern Books from Famedram.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article