GOLLY gosh. The controversial Golly character that first appeared on jam jars in 1910, courtesy of James Robertsons and Son of Paisley, has finally been dumped by its producers.
Condemned as a racist symbol throughout the 1980s, the inch-high black character with bow-tie and red and yellow suit will be replaced by Roald Dahl characters, including Fantastic Mr Fox and The Twits.
Ginny Knox, brand director for Robertson's, said the decision to remove the Golly was taken after research found that children were not familiar with the character, although it still appealed to the older generations. She denied Golly was being ''retired'' because it was an offensive image.
''We sell 45 million jars of jam and marmalade each year and they have pretty much all got Golly on them,'' said Ms Knox. ''We also sell 250,000 Golly badges to collectors and only get 10 letters a year from people who don't like the Golly.
''Whereas we are concerned about those people and it's not our intention to be offensive with the Golly, we have to look at what our research says and what the sales say.''
Golly will be replaced by the World of Roald Dahl, with seven characters, illustrated by Quentin Blake. The Big Friendly Giant, Matilda, James & the Giant Peach, and Willy Wonka from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, all will appear.
The new characters will start appearing on jars of Robertson's jams and Golden Shred marmalade from September 1. But the Golly will continue to feature on the company's mincemeat until Christmas.
The character, originally called the Golliwogg, was seen by John Robertson, son of the company founder, James, on a business trip to America.
He noticed lots of children playing with a little rag doll made from their mothers' discarded black skirts and white blouses, and was intrigued by their popular appeal.
The launch of the Golly Collectors' Scheme in 1928 showed its appeal extended far beyond mere children.
People were invited to send in coupons collected from the jar label in exchange for a badge, showing Golly dressed as a golfer, wearing a waistcoat with the words Golden Shred.
This formed the first in a series of badges featuring Golly playing various sports. In 1932, Robertson's moved away from Golly and sports, issuing a set of six fruit badges which was continued until 1939, when the metal was requisitioned to support the war effort.
The scheme returned in 1946 and, since then, the company has produced a wide range of Golly figures, all now considered valuable collector's items.
Others, however, were less impressed. Left-wing groups protested throughout the 1980s, demanding the company drop the image, which they said was derogatory to all ethnic people.
In 1983, the Greater London Council stopped buying the firm's jam and marmalade, saying the Golly was racist.
Earlier that year, left-wing groups in Liverpool criticised the decision to use the Golly in the city's international garden festival. In 1984, councillors in the London borough of Islington banned a Golly-bearing road safety exhibition poster.
Milestones in a TOY STORY
l The Golly began life as a story book character, and only later appeared as a toy for children.
l Florence Kate Upton, who was born in 1873 in Flushing, New York, created the Golliwogg character. His name was
originally spelt with two gs, but the second was eventually dropped.
l Collectors prefer to refer to him by the shortened version of his name, Golly or Golli, to avoid causing any racist offence.
l The Golliwogg was based on a toy Florence had played with as a child and was probably a black minstrel-type doll that came from an American fair.
l During the early 1900s, many soft toy manufacturers started producing their own versions of Golliwogs. Many home-made versions were also made, as the simple, unjointed, rag doll type Golliwog was easy to copy.
l During the first half of the twentieth century, the Golliwog was a children's favourite, exceeded in popularity only by the Teddy Bear.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article