AFTER nearly 50 years of Christmas broadcasts, the Queen has started to sound like a TV newsreader, language experts claimed yesterday.
Australian researchers who carried out a detailed acoustic analysis of the festive messages discovered that Her Majesty's voice has acquired a common touch.
It is not quite Eliza Doolittle in reverse, but tests on 11 different vowel sounds showed a tendency towards modern received pronunciation.
This is known as standard southern-British (SSB), as exemplified by BBC female broadcasters of the 1980s, with whom the scientists made their comparisons.
The researchers, from Macquarie University in Sydney, conducted an acoustic analysis of the vowels from the Queen's Christmas message from every year since 1952.
With the permission of Buckingham Palace, they compared the vowel sounds from the 1950s with those from the 1980s, and compared both with recordings by BBC broadcasters such as Angela Rippon.
Their analysis, published in this week's edition of Nature magazine, show the Queen's pronunciation of some vowels has been influenced by SSB, which is more typically associated with speakers who are younger and lower in the social hierarchy.
''Although modern received pronunciation has resisted many of the stigmatised features of the London cockney accent, such as aitch dropping, it has nevertheless been influenced by cockney - for example in the tendency to pronounce the 'l' in milk as a vowel,'' said Professor Jonathan Harrington, who led the research.
He pointed out that the standard British accent, or received pronunciation, has undergone many changes over the years, some of which have paralleled the changing attitudes towards social class.
There was marked social stratification in Britain in the 1950s. Even in the 1960s, when class barriers were starting to weaken, David Abercrombie, the phonetician, wrote: ''One either speaks received pronunciation or one does not, and if the opportunity to learn it in youth has not arisen, it is almost impossible to learn it in later life.''
But as class distinctions have become blurred, so too have the boundaries between English accents that mark social class, said Professor Harrington. This has been a trend led by younger people, who rejected received pronunciation because of its association with the establishment.
The older generation resented this, but were they impervious to it, or did they unwittingly adapt their accent towards community changes, he wondered. In fact, as he demonstrated, they have rubbed off on no less a person than the Queen.
''Thus, there has been a drift in the Queen's accent towards one that is characteristic of speakers who are younger and/or lower in the social hierarchy,'' said Professor Harrington.
''We conclude that the Queen no longer speaks the Queen's English of the 1950s, although the vowels of the 1980s Christmas message are clearly set apart from those of an SSB accent.''
The extent of such community influences was probably more marked for most adult speakers, who were not in the position of having to defend a particular form of English - in this case, the Queen's English.
He added: ''The chances of societies and academies successfully preserving a particular form of pronunciation against the influence of community and social changes are as unlikely as King Canute's attempts to defeat the tides.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article