Shell plunged into another public relations disaster last night as it stood by its threat to close unprofitable retail sites in rural areas in spite of making global profits of $8.6bn last year.
Mr John Edmonds, general secretary of the GMB, launched a vitriolic attack on the oil company as it emerged Shell is continuing to appeal to Government for ''a form of subsidy'' to maintain low profit-making retail sites in country areas.
Last night, Shell inflamed trade union fury as it confirmed global profits of $8.6bn. A Shell spokesman insisted the company's policy was nothing to do with last week's fuel protest but reflected the economics of petrol retailing in sparsely populated areas.
But Shell's stated recognition of the importance of their rural sites cut no ice with Mr Edmonds who was incensed at the company's ultimatum of closing stations or hiking up prices.
He said: ''The gas guzzler's greed is insatiable. For a company that has made such massive profits to come cap in hand to the taxpayer is scandalous. Working people are simply not prepared to see more of their tax revenue pumped into the coffers of the fattest cats in the corporate jungle''.
Shell pleaded ''historically low'' profits to justify closure or higher prices at smaller rural sites. It blamed its inability to maintain rural petrol stations on the increasing popularity of supermarkets, and the higher running costs and fewer competitors in rural areas.
Shell said it expected locally-based companies who were not bound by global constraints to step into the breach.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article