A LABOUR peer who advises the Home Secretary on race issues has attacked the Government for continuing to give the controversial author Salman Rushdie police protection.
Lord Ahmed of Rotherham criticised the fact that despite the author's decision to base himself in the United States, his protection is being paid for by the British taxpayer.
He claims that the annual bill for minding Mr Rushdie - subject of a fatwa or death sentence from the late Ayatollah Khomeini - has risen to #1m a year, and that there is no sign of the protection being ended.
The Indian-born author came
to the world's attention when his book, The Satanic Verses, was branded blasphemous by the Iranian leadership in 1989.
Muslims across the world who believed their beliefs had been ridiculed were urged to kill him and a hefty bounty was put on the author's head. The Government then granted him 24-hour security.
Mr Rushdie has now moved to the United States - but it is understood that the British taxpayer is still paying about #1m a year for the author's protection. Lord Ahmed said: ''Money which is being wasted on Salman Rushdie could be better spent on providing bobbies on the beat, rather than wasting our money on someone who is wealthy enough anyway and who could provide protection to himself.
''It gives the wrong signal that British Muslims are still after Salman Rushdie and it gives him that importance. Muslims in Britain are not even interested, they don't even want to know,''
he told BBC Radio 4.
A spokesman at New Scotland Yard said: ''We are not prepared to comment on matters of security or protection.''
A Home Office spokesman also declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article