BILL Miller, MEP, attempts to present New Labour's action on tobacco advertising as a great victory for Europe (September 27). The truth is that it was a shameful sellout to Bernie Ecclestone for a #1m donation to New Labour which he then got back.
I was an MEP from 1994-99 and as vice-president of the Health Intergroup was closely involved in the struggle to reduce the death-rate from lung cancer which kills 500,000 Europeans every year. New Labour in Opposition was committed to a Europe-wide ban; indeed, I chaired a meeting of the Intergroup where Kevin Barron, the Labour Shadow Health Spokesperson, gave a clear assurance that Labour would ban tobacco advertising. Interestingly, he never got a job as Minister of Health - perhaps we now know why.
When New Labour changed its line to weaken the directive and support a long exemption for Formula One everyone in the European public health movement was disgusted and the Commission, the Council, and the Parliament were astonished. The story is that Tessa Jowell, the Minister of Health, had her brief rewritten from Downing Street in the middle of the negotiations. All the Labour MEPs knew the score but were told by Millbank to keep quiet as ''Formula One was very important for Britain''.
As we now know from Andrew Rawnsley's new book, Blair was terrified that the Ecclestone donation would finish him politically. Yet his Government faithfully carried out Ecclestone's wishes in Europe and exempted Formula One from the ban. It was an early sign that New Labour has more interest in the interests of big business than in the health of the people. No rewriting of history by Bill Miller can change that.
Hugh Kerr,
Mintaro Mews, Mintaro,
South Australia 5415. September 30.
THE thundering bureacratic lunacy which has come into play following on two E.coli outbreaks in the last 50 years defies belief. Hundreds of small family firms are now threatened with extinction because they do not have licences and some of them have been selling meat for generations. Yet the Government sees no problem in allowing shops to sell cigarettes which have killed infinitely more people in the same time, or accepting donations to promote advertising for cigarettes in motor racing, which has also killed infinitely more people in the same time.
In the same way as cigarette packets carry a warning, which has been a complete failure anyway, why cannot the butchers who do not satisfy the Government's so-called standards exhibit a similar warning and let the public decide what they want to do? Or, as usual, do the politicians know best?
Iain Sutherland,
18 Smith Terrace, Wick. October 2.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article