DIARIES: Into Politics
Alan Clark
Weidenfeld & Nicolson, #20
BY the time of his death in 1999, Alan Clark had been keeping diaries for almost five decades. The first volume was not published until 1993, but when it arrived it did so on the dessert trolley.
After the stale fare of umpteen dull political memoirs came this mouth-watering concoction of sex and sniping which exposed Westminster, during 1983-1991, at its glorious worst.
Now, after a seven-year wait, the second helping of Clark flambe, covering 1972-82, has arrived. Those who dig in their spoons will find all the familiar ingredients of the first volume - hypochondria, backgammon, girls, dogs, fast cars, and insults - yet somehow it is not as satisfying, and parts of it even leave a nasty aftertaste.
Clark was born into money - the family wealth came from Clark's Cotton Thread in Paisley - and he followed the trail of privilege into Eton, Oxford, the RAF, and on to the Bar. He had been trying for a safe seat from the late 1960s but didn't land one until 1972, the same year in which his father, Lord Clark, gave him Saltwood Castle in Kent.
By the time this volume begins
he is a man with everything - wealth, two sons, a devoted wife, and ambition.
Gaining office should have been a walk in St James's Park, but he wasn't to become a minister until 1986. Before then, as these diaries reveal, he was frequently in despair, wondering if the game was worth it. His constituency association in Plymouth Sutton irritate him with their demands for visits, elections are a gut-wrenching chore, and constituents waiting to see him are ''mendicants''. Thoughts of resigning begin to surface by 1975.
It is around this time that he begins to flirt with standing for the National Front. Of two NF members who visit his surgery, he writes: ''I thought how good they were, and how brave is the minority, in a once great country, who still keep alive the tribal essence.'' At one point he watches the film Cabaret before going to bed, enjoying ''that wonderful uplifting scene in the beer garden when the young SA boy leads the singing of Tomorrow Belongs to Me''.
One might laugh at such outrageousness, just as many gasped and smiled guiltily at his description of an African country in the first volume as Bongo Bongo Land, and yet, in these post-Stephen Lawrence days, I don't imagine many readers finding this racist bilge amusing
any more.
If he is a man out of time on race, he is antediluvian when it comes to ''birds and birdettes''. It is difficult to read about his visit to a girls' school, after which he confesses to nearly having a wet dream about a pupil, ''playing around with her and get-ting increasingly 'hot''', without wanting to have a shower - hot, not cold - afterwards.
He loved Jane, his ''sweet, loyal'' wife, and he adored girls. Other women - such as the journalist who skewered his vanity by asking how old he was - were not so lovable.
And then there was ''The Lady'', Margaret Thatcher, a different breed altogether. She bewitches him with her ''Eva Peron'' beauty, but he was not above disloyalty to his queen, pondering, in his darkest hours, whether he wouldn't progress further if she were evicted.
The ''coven'' - the judge's wife and two daughters with whom he had an on-off relationship - make their debut here, but anyone looking for a boy's own tale of rumpy-pumpy
with the below-stairs classes will
be disappointed. ''I do not under
any circumstances discuss my relations with the ladies,'' Clark tells
his diary. ''I am a gentleman, not
a hairdresser.''
For a gossip, his lack of candour can be infuriating at times. One girlfriend - unnamed, of course - puts the squeeze on him for #5000. There's a panic to pay her off, during which he is ably assisted by a certain Jonathan Aitken, but almost as soon as the drama begins the curtain falls and we are none the wiser as to what it was all about.
It is the same with the fall of Heath and the rise of Thatcher, of which there are no mentions. Clark is too busy with his own history to bother with anyone else's. He lives for the Commons, padding elegantly through its corridors, taking verbal swipes at the big beasts and purring over others.
Thus John Major is a ''toad''; Margaret Beckett is ''sexy little Miss Horseface''; Leon Brittan is ''loathsome, oily'', Scotland and Wales are ''wanky little principalities'', etc, etc.
It's all diverting stuff, but we have been here before in much more interesting times. Clark's diaries as
a Minister are unmissable; these frustrated musings of a playboy backbencher are not. Every old
dog has his day, and Mr Clark,
and his diaries, appear to have
had theirs.
Alison Rowat
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article