Place:
Glasgow Zoo
For much of its recent history Glasgow Zoo has been facing predictions of its imminent closure. The latest in the past few days were prompted by allegations of animals suffering because of
poor conditions.
But it was not always such a sad story. When it opened more than half a century ago at Calderpark, on the south-east outskirts of the city, it was an instant hit, attracting tens of thousands of visitors from all over west-
central Scotland.
Once one of Scotland's top visitor attractions, it has deteriorated rapidly and its difficulties were exacerbated by its enforced closure for six weeks during last year's foot-and- mouth epidemic.
Ten years ago the zoo was welcoming 150,000 visitors through the gates every year, but that was when they could boast such attractions as elephants and polar bears. It has also been a victim of changing public tastes and growing disapproval of the idea of caged animals kept for entertainment.
Despite the best efforts of its charismatic director, Richard O'Grady, who was the zoo's public face for almost 30 years, the decline has been steady. When he died suddenly in February last year, the zoo lost its most vocal champion. It only just survived a closure threat last April when its licence came up for renewal.
Run by the Zoological Society of Glasgow and the West of Scotland, the zoo is understood to have debts of more than (pounds) 2m. Glasgow City Council withdrew an annual subsidy of more than (pounds) 130,000 in 2000.
According to society members, O'Grady kept the zoo running on a ''peanut'' budget by ''sheer determination and force of personality''.
The zoo has been in talks with a major builder about selling off 26 acres for private housing development. Miller Homes is seeking planning consent for the project, but even if it leads to a substantial cash injection, a major question mark remains as to whether it will be enough to sustain a long-term future for the zoo.
More selections from The Herald's picture archives can be viewed and purchased through our website www.theherald.co.uk, click on the photosales button.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article