A FORMER hotel worker yesterday told the High Court in Glasgow that he
saw a man twice being thrown out of a fourth-floor window.
Mr Raymond Henfry, 28, said he looked into a bedroom during a New Year
party and saw two men pushing Mr Kenneth Syme, 48, from the window. He
claimed the men were Mr Kenneth McGuire, 35, and Mr Michael Fay, 28.
Mr McGuire and Mr Fay deny repeatedly throwing Mr Syme, of Fullers
Gate, Faifley, Clydebank, out of the window of their fourth-floor flat
at Watchmeal Crescent nearby, and murdering him on January 1 this year.
Mr McGuire also denies punching and kicking Mr John Slevin, c/o the
police, to his permananent disfigurement in the flat that night, and
threatening to throw Mr Ian Reid from the window on a previous occasion.
He further denies tying Mr Syme up in plastic bags, hiding him in a
wheelie-bin, and moving him to nearby lock-up garages.
Earlier, Mr Henfry had his plea of not guilty to murder accepted by
the Crown. He admitted helping to move Mr Syme in the wheelie-bin, and
that he attempted to defeat the ends of justice. He will be sentenced at
the end of the trial.
Mr Henfry told the court that when he looked into the bedroom the man
was hanging out head first and trying to hold on to the sides. He said
he ran forward and tried to pull him back by his legs.
He said he was pushed back by Mr McGuire, and Mr Syme disappeared over
the edge. When he looked out, he could see him lying on his back on the
ground.
The former barman said they all rejoined the party for a few drinks in
the living-room before he and Mr Fay went outside. Mr Syme was lying on
his back but was still breathing, and he used his knowledge of first aid
to check for broken bones. Then they carried him back to the bedroom
''to keep him warm''. He was still breathing and they put him on a bed.
Questioned by Mr Ian Duguid, prosecuting, he alleged Mr McGuire came
into the bedroom and shouted: ''What's that bastard still doing here.''
Mr Henfry said: ''He shoved past me and opened the window, grabbed Mr
Syme by the back of his neck and waist and papped him back out of the
window.''
Later, he claimed, Mr McGuire went outside, tied bin bags around Mr
Syme's head and legs, and put him head first into a wheelie-bin and took
him away somewhere.
Mr Henfry told the court that when Mr McGuire came in and threw Mr
Syme back out again he was ''shocked, stunned''.
Asked if anything was said in the bedroom the second time, Mr Henfry
said: ''No, not a word. McGuire just walked back to the living-room as
if nothing had happened.
''I went back to the living-room. I should have bolted. I sat down. I
was shaking.''
He claimed he then saw Mr McGuire kicking and punching Mr Slevin till
he was unconscious.
Asked why he did not get up and leave the party to get help, he said:
''I was in a state of shock. I was frightened of McGuire.''
When he asked Mr McGuire about Mr Syme, he said the accused told him:
''He owed me money.''
Mr Henfry agreed that he then went to another party, but told no-one
about what had happened until interviewed by police the following day
and was jointly charged with the murder.
Cross-examined by Mr Donald Findlay, QC, defending, Mr Henfry said he
had recently passed a first aid course with the Territorial Army and
examined Mr Syme the first time he was pushed out the window, and found
no bleeding or fractures.
Mr Findlay: ''So you just carried him back to the same house where he
had been chucked out of a fourth floor window?''
Mr Henfry: ''Yes.''
Mr Findlay: ''Was that your idea of first aid?''
Mr Henfry: ''My idea was to get him to bed to keep him warm. He was
still breathing.''
He denied helping Mr McGuire to put the victim in the wheelie-bin, and
said he only helped to move the bin up a few stairs.
The trial before Lord Osborne continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article