COMMENTS made by the Conservative provost of Perth and Kinross were
used yesterday by the Scottish National Party as a stick to beat the
Conservative candidate as campaigning continued for the forthcoming
by-election caused by the death of Sir Nicholas Fairbairn.
The SNP claimed a leaflet distributed in the area at the weekend on
behalf of Mr John Godfrey was a clear attempt to make party political
capital out of the VE Day celebrations.
Extracts from the leaflet, according to the SNP, read: ''Monday is VE
Day. Britain will commemorate the victory over nationalism . . . Fifty
years on, we should take this opportunity to reflect on the fact that
Scotland achieves far more working in partnership with the rest of the
United Kingdom.''
However, SNP chief executive Michael Russell claimed a letter he
received from local Tory provost Mrs Jean McCormack, on the same day the
leaflet was being distributed, said she felt ''very strongly'' that the
celebration of victory in Europe 50 years ago should not be used for any
political advantage or be in any way associated with the forthcoming
by-election.
Mr Russell said: ''There is massive opposition -- including from the
Tory provost of Perth and Kinross -- to the Tories' disgraceful efforts
to appropriate VE Day for party political purposes.''
He argued that everyone except the Conservatives wanted to approach
the celebrations in a spirit of unity. ''That is how it should be,'' Mr
Russell said. ''But the Tories are spoiling this historic occasion for
everyone with their shameless politicking.''
Calling for the leaflet to be withdrawn, he added: ''It seems that
nothing is sacred to the Tories any more -- nothing is above their low
party politics.''
The clash of opinions over the monarchy in the by-election campaign
continued with a strong personal attack by Mr Bill Walker, Conservative
MP for North Tayside, on SNP candidate Roseanna Cunningham.
On Friday, the Tories described Ms Cunningham as a ''closet
republican''. She later said the monarchy was the ''pinnacle of the
class system''.
Mr Walker said yesterday he was ''appalled'' that the SNP candidate
saw fit to ''belittle our monarchy at this poignant time.
''We are not going to take lectures from someone whose formative
political years were not even spent in this country,'' the MP said,
referring to Ms Cunningham's claim that her republican views originated
from her time in Australia.
Mr Walker, pointing out that the monarchy existed long before
Australia was even discovered, argued that it represented ''the
cornerstone of our unwritten constitution and the foundation of our
parliamentary democracy.
''How dare she peddle her Australian republican sentiments, which even
she admits are not compatible with this deeply loyal constituency.''
The Tory MP's comments were described as ''outrageous'' by SNP deputy
leader Dr Allan Macartney, who said: ''According to Mr Walker, people
who were not brought up in this country have no right to express views
on its future.
''These are nasty, narrow-minded sentiments -- from an increasingly
nasty, narrow-minded party.''
Meanwhile, Shadow Scottish Secretary George Robertson, speaking at the
adoption meeting of Labour candidate George Alexander in Perth and
Kinross, said last week's local election results in England and Wales
had been an ''unmitigated disaster'' for the Tories.
''They are more than just a vote of no confidence in the Tories,'' he
said. ''They are a sign that people are turning to new Labour. All over
the country, people want to hear more about Labour. They will have that
chance in Perth and Kinross.''
Mr Robertson claimed the Tories were ''hopelessly out of touch with
the Scottish people''. While Labour already had detailed plans for a
Scottish parliament the Tories only policy on the constitution, he said,
was ''to do nothing''.
He said Labour's national team would publish six policy papers, on the
economy, health, crime, education, the information superhighway, and on
regional government, in the next three months. In Scotland, new Labour
would freshen up policies on housing, education, and health.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article