IT is tempting to fall into gloom at the news that the US naval base
at Edzell will close progressively over the next two years. The effect
on the surrounding area will undoubtedly be significant, especially as
the base is believed to contribute annually some #20m to local
households and businesses. Just as inevitably, some local figures are
determined to present the closure as a disaster. It is serious, but it
is not as desperate as that. Indeed the evidence from Dunoon and
district, which suffered the much larger withdrawal of the US base on
the Holy Loch, is that events of this sort can act as a catalyst,
propelling local initiatives to the forefront and subsequently drawing
in fresh employment and business from outside.
The Cowal Peninsula lost well over 800 jobs when the Holy Loch base
closed in 1992, and the event was followed by dire predictions of
economic and social collapse. Nothing of the sort happened. Local
ginger groups were formed to combat the loss of jobs and revenue and by
last year it was clear that initiatives in the area and from outside
were on the point of recouping all of the jobs lost when the Americans
left. At this moment the Cowal area is one of two sites in Scotland
firmly in line for a 2000-job semiconductor plant from abroad. The fact
that it is in contention points to the effectiveness of local
rehabilitation and the self-confidence and skills of the workforce.
There is no reason why the same should not happen around Edzell.
Government help will be needed, and already there is word of a task
force which will assess the future potential. North Angus has suffered a
blow, but it will not be fatal and may even lead to better things.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article