IT will be for the victims of Japanese atrocities during the Second
World War to decide whether or not to accept the apology offered by
Japan's Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama, the Government said yesterday.
Downing Street sources said Mr Major was ''obviously pleased'' with
the terms of the letter, received last month, in which Mr Murayama
expressed ''remorse and apology'' for the sufferings inflicted by the
Imperial Army on civilians and prisoners of war.
However, a spokesman for Mr Major made it clear it was for veterans
and other victims to judge. ''The apology is not directed specifically
at the Prime Minister. It is really aimed at those who were affected.
They are the people who must judge whether it is satisfactory.''
Confusion has surrounded the apology since it was announced. Veterans
have complained that it was made by Mr Murayama personally, and not the
Japanese Government on behalf of the Japanese people, and that it failed
to make any offer of compensation.
On Saturday, veterans' anger was increased when Mr Murayama appeared
to deny that the letter to Mr Major, intended to congratulate him on his
victory in the Tory leadership contest, was meant as an apology.
Yesterday, the Japanese embassy issued a statement insisting the
letter was indeed an apology. ''Prime Minister Murayama's comments on 12
August in no way contradict the view which he expressed in the letter.
There is no change on the part of Prime Minister Murayama and the
Japanese Government regarding that view,'' it declared.
The Downing Street official also said the Government would ''continue
to make plain to the Japanese Government the strength of feeling in this
country about the issue of compensation''. The Japanese Government is
being sued for #14,000 in compensation for each of about 73,000 Pacific
war veterans.
Today, attention will focus on commemorations of the 50th anniversary
of the Japanese surrender, when Mr Murayama is expected to make a
long-awaited formal and public apology for Japan's war crimes.
Former prisoners of war are threatening a ''militant'' campaign
against Japan if Mr Murayama fails to deliver an apology.
Solicitor Martyn Day, who represents the Japanese Labour Camps
Survivors' Association and the Association of British Civilian Internees
Far East Region, said the direction of their campaign rested on what Mr
Murayama said today.
He added: ''There is an overwhelming feeling that until the Japanese
apologise, people can never go forward. There is a lot of anger over
what has happened in the last three days. There is a lot of resentment
that the Japanese Government cannot get it right even at this late
stage.''
Mr Arthur Titherington, 73, secretary of the survivors' association,
said: ''We will have to take a more militant approach if we do not get
our apology. We have talked about boycotting Japanese goods. We would
need John Major to stand behind us personally.''
* Sir Hector Monro, Tory MP for Dumfries, yesterday demanded an
official apology from Mr Murayama and called on the Japanese Government
to pay full compensation.
Sir Hector, a Second World War RAF veteran who helped with the
transport home from the Far East of liberated PoWs, said: ''I think
really it would be far better if the prime minister made a clean breast
and made a genuine apology on behalf of the Japanese nation.
''Step two is whether or not they will pay compensation. When you hear
the first-hand accounts of what our prisoners were subjected to, the
Japanese owe us a great deal more than the pathetic statement we got
this week.''
Sir Hector was launching an information service in St Andrew's House,
Edinburgh, to reunite veterans.
Veterans unable to call at St Andrew's House are advised to telephone
the Vetlink staff at 0131 557 9804.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article