Kuwait, Tuesday
A KUWAITI anti-corruption watchdog is to investigate a planned purchase of British naval missiles after officials rejected a cheaper French offer.
Parliament gave its public funds protection committee two weeks to report on the government's choice of British Aerospace Sea Skua missiles over French MM-15 missiles made by Aerospatiale.
``This is wrong. This should not happen,'' said opposition Islamist MP Mubarak al-Duwailah, who told Defence Minister Sheikh Ahmad Hamoud al-Sabah: ``You should have decided it on the figures.''
Kuwaiti newspapers say the British weapons would cost about 27m dinars (#60m) and the French missiles about 22m dinars.
Kuwaiti opposition MPs, who have staged a vigorous four-year campaign against alleged corruption in arms procurement, say they want to know more about the missile transaction to ensure that it involves no impropriety.
Kuwaiti newspapers have said Kuwait and British Aerospace are due to sign the accord within the next few days, but MPs said today that the government would have to hold off until the report was completed.
Defence Minister Sheikh Ahmad Hamoud al-Sabah told parliament that quality was the deciding factor. The Sea Skua had proved itself in service in the 1991 Gulf War, he said, adding the MM-15 had not been through a similar test.
``The British missile is far better than the French missile,'' he said.
The missiles are due to be installed on eight fast patrol boats worth #333m sold to Kuwait by France last year.-Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article