Sydney, Thursday
IVAN MILAT'S defence lawyer today pointed the finger of guilt at Milat's brother as being more likely to have murdered seven backpackers in Australia's worst serial killing.
In his final address in the New South Wales Supreme Court, Terry Martin said the jury just had to look at the way Richard Milat conducted himself at the trial.
``Do you think it is reasonably possible that he was the killer and not Ivan Milat?'' Martin asked.
He listed numerous features including the description given by the surviving backpacker who was allegedly attacked by Ivan Milat; Richard Milat's access to firearms, ammunition, and to Ivan's house; and the discovery of rope in Richard's car which was very similar to rope found near one murder scene.
Further, he referred to comments Richard made to fellow workers, which suggested he knew the German backpackers' bodies were in the Belanglo State Forest before they were found.
``Is it not highly suggestive that Richard Milat is the killer?'' Martin said.
He said evidence was given by another workmate that Richard Milat once said ``stabbing a woman is like cutting a loaf of bread''.
``Why would anyone say anything as hideous as that in a joking fashion?'' he said.
``Do you not regard, in the circumstances of this case, that that was a very sinister thing to say?''
Milat has pleaded not guilty to murdering seven backpackers whose bodies were found in the forest, about 65 miles south-west of Sydney in the New South Wales southern highlands, between September 1992 and November 1993.
The 51-year-old roadworker has also pleaded not guilty to kidnapping another traveller in January 1990.
The victims were: Britons Caroline Clarke, 21, of Slaley, Nortumberland and Joanne Lesley Walters, 22, from Maesteg, Wales; German couple Gabor Neugebauer, 21, of Munich, and Anja Habschied, 20, from Karlsfeld; German traveller Simone Schmidl, 21, from Regensburg; James Gibson, 19 and Deborah Everist, 19, both from Victoria, Australia.-AP.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article