THE fate of Diana, Princess of Wales, was raised by the former Chief Rabbi last night, in a passionate defence of marriage.
In a toughly worded Lords speech about selfishness in society and broken marriages that result, Lord Jakobovits spoke of the affair between the Princess - after her divorce from the Prince of Wales - and Dodi Al Fayed.
He said: ''The People's Princess would still be alive and so would her lover if they had observed absolute fidelity within marriage as an inviolate principle. What a price the nation had to pay for marital infidelity.''
Lord Jakobovits, in a debate on the role of marriage, also hit out at Chancellor Gordon Brown for scrapping the married couple's allowance in the Budget and Home Secretary Jack Straw for saying the state should not make moral judgments about marriage.
''Are the present depressing trends reversible? Of course they are, provided we have the will to reverse them and to stop encouraging the further erosion of marriage.''
He protested: ''The Home Secretary, in a television interview the other day, argued that the Government, now representing a secular state, should altogether withdraw from moral judgments affecting marriage.
''When the stability of the home is no longer the business of the Home Secretary, then clearly the last ramparts protecting the home are crumbling.
''The Foreign Secretary has gone further. The moral values of his policies are for exports to distant overseas communities, but not reflected in the stability of marriage at home.
''And the Chancellor has removed the last financial prop to the encouragement of marriage.
''We have already paid an extortionately high price as a nation for our indifference to marriage,'' said Lord Jakobovits.
Labour ex-Cabinet minister the Earl of Longford, a prominent Roman Catholic, declared: ''Sex outside marriage is a sin. Once you accept that, either you accept marriage or the human race dies out.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article