BAA, formerly British Airports Authority, suddenly announced the
resignation of its chief executive of two years' standing Jeremy
Marshall.
The company's bald statement to this effect added that BAA chairman
Sir Norman Payne would assume the chief executive's responsibilities
until a successor for Mr Marshall had been found.
A spokesman later denied that Mr Marshall had gone following a
boardroom row, adding that he had left ''on mutually agreed terms to
pursue other business interests.''
Any compensation paid for the loss of his #220,000 plus a year job
will only appear in next year's BAA annual report. Only two months ago
Mr Marshall's picture appeared in the annual report for 1988/89. He was
listed as having 9982 BAA shares plus options on a further 168,950.
Mr Marshall became chief executive in June 1987, after several years
with Hanson Trust, latterly with its Imperial Foods subsidiary.
His abrupt and unexplained departure, along with further
reorganisation of the board, is bound to fuel speculation about internal
dissension within the BAA board, which is under pressure from airlines,
particularly British Airways, to expand its airport facilities more
rapidly.
BA is putting strong pressure on the company to build a fifth terminal
at London's Heathrow Airport. And there is continuing doubt about the
viability of Prestwick. The group also takes in Glasgow, Aberdeen and
Edinburgh airports.
BAA maintains that the priority is to sort out Europe's air traffic
control problems. More terminal capacity comes second, followed by
runway capacity.
Longer-term worries for the group include a forthcoming review of its
activites by the Office of Trading and moves by the European Commission
to harmonise duties, which could mean the demise of duty free shops.
These currently generate #135m of annual revenue for BAA and a large
though undisclosed slice of profits.
Mr Jeremy Marshall
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article