THE Scottish National Party decided to go for broke on its strategy of
independence through Europe with a landslide vote to boycott the
Scottish Constitutional Convention at its national council in Port
Glasgow at the weekend.
The debate showed that the Nationalists view the convention, due to
meet on March 30, as little more than a Labour trap to lure them into
campaigning for devolution.
In a remarkable gamble the leadership, disregarding plummeting
fortunes in opinion polls wiping out the Govan by-election gain, argued
later that with the split over the convention sidelined, the party's
poll tax and European election campaigns would quickly bring a
resurgence in popularity.
Govan victor Mr Jim Sillars said: ''We are perfectly prepared to take
our chances with the Scottish people.'' He promised that the SNP would
take a neutral attitude to the convention and not undermine it.
Canon Kenyon Wright, general secretary of the Scottish Council of
Churches and chair of the convention's business committee, said
yesterday: ''There will be no breast-beating or scoring of points off
the SNP by us.
''I feel that their decision not to take part will do more damage to
them than to the convention. They are effectively excluding themselves
but we will go ahead, although it will be sad not having them there.
''It is very strange that outside of a convention that will have the
overwhelming support of the Scottish people, will be the SNP and the
Tories, who seem to be saying in agreement with each other that the only
choice is the status quo or total independence.''
The vote, taken at a highly-charged national council with more than
500 people, was by l9l votes to 41 to accept their negotiators'
recommendation not to take part. It was the ultimate triumph after 15
years' debate for the independence hard-liners.
National executive dissident Ms Isobel Lindsay and a handful of
supporters argued forlornly that the party would be out of tune with a
Scottish people desperate for home rule.
The SNP's decline in electoral popularity since it walked out of the
cross-party talks is clearly reflected in two successive polls. A
Scotsman/Mori poll showed Labour 45%, SNP 24%, Tories 21%, Democrats 6%,
SDP 4%. A Scotland on Sunday/BBC On The Record/Mori poll yesterday had
Labour 46%, Tories 23%, SNP 20%, Democrats 5% and SDP 5%.
The Glasgow Herald's System Three poll in January had the SNP at 32%,
its highest popularity rating in 12 years. On current trends it has
forfeited entirely the Govan surge and its prospects of capturing the
North-East Scotland, South of Scotland, and Mid Scotland and Fife
Euro-seats must be severely dented.
The Campaign for a Scottish Assembly says the door remains open for
the SNP, which has insisted on a directly-elected body, increased
membership, sovereignty for the Scottish people should Mrs Thatcher
reject convention demands, and a multi-choice referendum.
Even after the weekend decision the Nationalists said they wished the
convention well and would take part if all their demands were met.
Against this Labour argues that there is little point in a convention if
the referendum were conceded. The SNP then proceeded to campaign against
its preferred option.
SNP leader Mr Gordon Wilson defended the vote as a principled decision
and added: ''We have thrown down the gauntlet to the Labour Party. Why
do they deny the Scottish people a referendum?
''We are not making any threats or ultimata. This non-elected
convention as presently established is going nowhere, but heading
straight for the rocks of a Prime Ministerial veto without the
protection of the Scottish people behind it.''
He disputed that the SNP's opinion poll decline would be long term and
he had earlier said that the decision would take his party ''on the high
road to victory''.
He refused to accept they would be damaged by the vote, adding: ''What
we are seeing is the SNP going into campaigning mode on poll tax,
independence in Europe and the Euro-elections. To some extent what has
happened was unhelpful but in three weeks' time, when the poll tax bills
drop through letter-boxes, this will be the gut issue campaign for the
next six to nine months.
''We don't want to be involved in a farce or a circus that will be
doomed to failure in that period.''
Mr Sillars said that the choices facing the party had been between an
emotional claim or realpolitik. He felt enormously heartened it had come
down on the side of realpolitik.
The convention as proposed was self-appointed and deeply flawed
against the people's convention advocated by the SNP.
Individual SNP members would still campaign for the convention but Mr
Sillars, a vice-president, said: ''After our decision, any member taking
part in that convention does not do so representing the SNP unless the
options we have set out are met.''
Summing up the debate, he said: ''We have to decide whether we are
part of a marshmallow set of Scottish society that looks good until you
squeeze it and find nothing. We are going to take our country to
independence in Europe on the basis of hard-rock principle.''
The third negotiator, Mrs Margaret Ewing, MP for Moray, said that the
decision showed the maturity of the party. She added: ''It was a
demonstration of political astuteness.''
Ms Lindsay, who came under strong personal attack on occasion and
endured chants of ''Rhodesia'' and ''UDI'' when she asked what a
majority of SNP MPs could accomplish against a Thatcher Government,
stood steadfastly by her argument that the party was out of step with
public opinion on the convention.
''I suppose I am here in the Frank Bruno role,'' she said. Ms Lindsay
argued that in the end even the SNP would have to turn to the Scottish
institutions, such as the unions and churches, for support on the back
of having rejected in a careless and cavalier manner a ''magnificent,
historic opportunity'' to help establish the convention.
She warned that people would move away from the SNP and added: ''That
convention will meet on March 30 and make a ringing declaration
asserting the sovereign rights of the Scottish people. Are we going to
push that national drive forward or are we going to be out there
standing shoulder to shoulder with the Tory party and the CBI?''
Mr Ian Smith, Midlothian, said in her support that Scottish Labour
leader Mr Donald Dewar was anxious to exclude the SNP. He added: ''If we
come out we will have one fight on our hands. We have to take them on in
June in the Euro-elections and beat them. Otherwise we have serious
problems.''
Professor Neil McCormick, Edinburgh, one of the authors of the
Campaign for a Scottish Assembly's Claim of Right document, said the
party's strategy was wrong since if it went forward within the
convention and Mrs Thatcher rejected its claims, it would crystallise
the thinking of the Scottish people and leave the SNP in a strong
position.
Mr Jim Fairlie, Perth, said the matter of sovereignty was critical and
he said: ''If we are asking for devolution then England decides, but if
we are demanding independence then the Scots decide. Let the convention
appeal to Westminster and see how far they get.''
Mrs Winifred Ewing, MEP for Highlands and Islands, said it was a
matter of loyalty and resisting media criticism. She said: ''As we get
nearer power the press gets a lot hotter. We must keep our nerve and not
resort to the public squabbling that has caused a very serious drop in
electoral public opinion. If you want power, behave like a political
party and not a debating society.''
Mr Alex Salmond, MP for Banff and Buchan, launched a stern attack on
Ms Lindsay, accusing her of being more of a Unionist than the Secretary
of State for Scotland and ''more of a Unionist and a Conservative'' on
the referendum issue than Mr Charles Gray, leader of Strathclyde region,
who said it was ''perfectly possible''.
Leader comment
Dewar against independence
Continued on Page 18
Continued from Page 1
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article