THE Royal Opera House was sold out for this the UK premiere of Luciano
Berio's 1974 opera, his second collaboration with Italo Calvino. I took
a standing room ticket, and was glad to find the evening mercifully
short at two hours.
However, it was a great event. It is a complex and demanding work,
only made comprehensible by surtitles. Musically, not the kind of opera
one leaves whistling the tunes: more on the lines of a continuous
abstract ''sound tapestry'' which surrounds and supports the singers.
Imaginatively produced by Graham Vick, it was set as an operatic
rehearsal -- a theatre within a theatre -- the stage constantly busy
with the hubbub of theatrical life, singers and dancers rehearsing. In
addition there were lots of extraneous distractions: a lady sawn in
half, trapeze artists, a flying chorus and live vultures, etc.
The Tempest-based story, also resonant of Lear was really a vehicle
for exploring the artist's predicament -- a typical Calvino theme,
familiar from his novel, If on a Winter's Night. A king (the opera
composer) listens, trying to understand the process of artistic
communication. The director, however, has his own ideas of how to make
the work a theatrical success (a spectacular but superficial circus).
The composer is variously seen as an enchantress and a dumb,
inarticulate child; also revered more in death than in life.
But he is ultimately alone, leaving perhaps only ''a memory to the
future.''
Needless to say, the singing and playing were exemplary: Donald
McIntyre's masked baritone was supremely resigned and melancholic as the
king. Robert Tear (Director) and Kathryn Harries (Protagonista) also
starred. The composer conducted definitively.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article