IN this busy age we're all searching the DIY shop for the quickest,
most effective product and sometimes we become unstuck. I needed a
sealant against rising damp for a concrete floor from which a fireplace
had been removed. The rest of the floor had been sealed with epoxy
resin. At a cost of #30 a can, it was too big an outlay for a small
area.
The man in the St Andrews shop studied the label on the tin of
bitumen-based Tetratex Floor Waterproofer -- ''a new product'' -- and
was sure it would do the job at only #8, since it stated that ''it can
be used as a surface treatment on floors to prevent rising damp.''
I applied it to the area. The next day it was still sticky, but the
label said to give it time. ''Allow each coat to dry thoroughly before
subsequent coats.'' Three days later, if you'd walked over it, you would
have shed your shoes.
On the fifth sticky day I phoned Tetrosyl's marketing service at Bury.
The man didn't know much about the Floor Waterproofer but would take my
queries to the lab and phone back. He did -- to tell me that the product
didn't dry thoroughly, but would always be tacky.
Could I put a rubber-backed carpet on it? No, because it would stick
it to the floor and, anyway, it wasn't supposed to be used with rubber,
as the label on the tin warned. Could I scrape it off? Probably not. Was
there a solvent? No. ''You could try white spirit but it'll make a mess
and it may not work.'' My wife was on her knees scraping for 12 hours,
but all she succeeded in doing was losing her temper and scoring the
resin sealant that overlapped with the bitumen.
I phoned Tetrosyl again. The man said he would send me up a bag of
special cement which I was to mix with water and pour on the floor. It
would then form a thin film over the bitumen. I pointed out that the
floor wasn't level and that the liquid cement would run, making even
more of a mess.
Then the man in the DIY shop had a bright idea. What do the squads who
lay tar on the roads use to clean their machines? He phoned around for
the answer: toxic chemicals that couldn't be used in the home. The man
at Tetrosyl said he would ask his Scottish rep to ''take a look'' when
he came back from his foreign holiday the following week. I explained
that I couldn't wait any longer since I had two other rooms piled with
the furniture and my wife was about to cancel relatives coming to stay.
I went back to the DIY shop, which suggested using a solution of
UniBond to seal the bitumen in. It seemed to work, till I decided to
cover the mess with a coat of Tetratex floor paint. Then the bitumen
started to bleed through the paint.
An architect advised that the safest thing to do was to try to skim
off the surface of the floor with a Kango hammer, a powerful drilling
tool (hire charge #17 a day). Cost of breaking up and re-laying section
of floor: #100.
The Citizens' Advice Bureau is only a phone call away in an emergency.
''A product must be as described; that's the law,'' the person manning
the line explained. ''Provided you've used it under the proper
circumstances, the manufacturers are at fault. Normally this applies to
a wrongly-sized vest or something like that. But with a floor problem
it's not enough to get your money back for the paint: you'll want
damages.''
What could I do to get my #100 back? ''You should apply in the first
instance to the retailers concerned and ask them what they're going to
do about it. You could then write to the manufacturers. We can write you
a letter for free, but if the manufacturers dig in their heels and say
'take us to court', there's nothing we can do. The trades description
people in Glenrothes may be able to help you.''
Fife Regional Council has an excellent trading standards and consumer
protection department. An official explained over the phone: ''Our prime
interest is in the description of the product, if it's inaccurate, and
whether it's inaccurate to a criminal extent. If the manufacturers have
marked it in the way you describe, it sounds as if you would at least
have theoretical recourse against them. That would be in negligence,
which is much more difficult to prove if you actually take it to legal
proof. The contract claim under the Sale of Goods Act would be against
the supplier and theoretically he would then take action against his
supplier.''
The official has been to take away the remains of the tin of Floor
Waterproofer for analysis to see if it fulfils the promises on the
label. If it doesn't, there could be a prosecution under trading
standards legislation.
The chemistry of DIY, with all those shelves of new products, has
become too complex. Pick up a can: it tells you to apply the substance
in a well-ventilated room, but it doesn't list the chemical content that
can damage your health. Like myself, you may have to try other chemicals
to remove the product, thereby creating a toxic reaction or a fire
hazard for the future.
There is surely a case for a chemical information service (financed by
the industry), which you can phone to get advice about possible hazards.
The case for manufacturers being more responsive and sympathetic to
customers who are left to clean up their mess is an obvious one.
''Without prejudice'' the manufacturers instructed the DIY shop to
settle my bill for #1OO, which didn't include anything for the
inconvenice caused, since the new floor has taken a month to dry out and
a week to seal with epoxy resin.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article