THE real punishment for John Hemmings was not the fine imposed
yesterday by the magistrates, but the confiscation of the major part of
his wild bird egg collection -- the largest seized anywhere in the world
-- which will now be offered to the British Museum.
While Hemmings thought he was evading the attention of what he called
''the spies'' of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, his name
was well known to them and had been for some time. But it was only when
a member of the family, after a squabble, informed them officially that
his large egg collection was hidden in his house that they were able
legally to apply for a search warrant.
Despite earlier denials to the investigating officers that he had
never stolen an egg from a nest in his life, Hemmings has since admitted
that he has taken part in many such a raid. But he insisted that all
these incidents were before the 1981 Act under which he was charged.
All in all, the sad case highlights that there is an underground
movement of wild bird egg collectors who still actively raid nests --
very often in the Highlands of Scotland -- every spring.
They do their best to keep their names secret and operate largely
through a society known as the Jordanians, after a nineteenth-century
clerical wild bird egg collector.
Much of the information of the whereabouts of the nests of rare birds
come to them from from estate workers. Hemmings has often sped north of
the Border on a tip-off from the Highlands. He thought the RSPB knew
little about him but he was wrong and the court hearing in Dartford was
given a strange insight into the weird world of egg collectors.
Hemmings and his like are not criminals in the real sense of the word.
Certainly what they do is against the law, but even officials in the
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds will concede that the problem
should be compared to drink and drug addiction rather than outright
theft.
Night after night, Hemmings sat in the loft of his house in Kent,
cataloguing his massive collection of 26,871 eggs. The only family of
birds he did not have were parrots and penguins.
He was amazed when investigation officers with the RSPB told him that
they would first have to catalogue his collection before interviewing
him in depth. In the event they found the task of identifying the vast
majority of the eggs quite simple. They relied largely on Hemmings's own
records, and he had done a good job. He knew the law well and falsified
his data cards to make it look that all his eggs were taken before the
Act under which he was convicted came into force.
Contrary to what most people believe, the active egg collector is not
necessarily interested in the rarest species in the world. For example,
many of them want to build up a major collection of the species that are
found in their own locality.
In John Hemmings's case, it appears, from his collection, that he was
obsessed by cuckoo eggs and many could not disguise their disgust at the
undercover operations perpetrated by the committed egg collector, nor
could they pretend that they were happy this collection was to be
offered to the British Museum. At the same time they did not want it
destroyed.
Hemmings kept records that showed the state of the egg when it was
taken from the nest; it could be 50% incubated. Schoolboys obviously
went nesting but it was always part of the honour of the game, that you
took only one egg from a clutch.
According to all the evidence open to the RSPB, wild bird collectors
go much further. If, for example, a bird would normally lay four eggs in
a nest and only two are laid, they will leave the nest alone until the
full clutch is laid. Only then will they remove the eggs. Should that
bird be of a species that will lay a second clutch, the RSPB have
evidence which shows the avid collector will come and snatch that too.
It will all be recorded in data cards.
When eggs are blown only one hole is drilled in the egg -- it has to
be as small as possible -- and air is introduced to push the content out
through the same hole. Hemmings's collection and data cards avidly
proved, this is not easy when say there is a chick embryo in the egg. In
that case the collector will introduce a solvent to disolve the embryo.
It is by no means certain that the British Museum will be prepared to
accept this infamous collection.
They were previously offered at least 10,000 eggs that formed its
bulk, and turned it down. More and more museums are becoming reluctant
to display in public wild bird collections -- just in case it encourages
the sort of crimes that Hemmings was convicted of yesterday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article