SIR David Steel, the presiding officer of the Scottish Parliament, yesterday came close to ejecting the first MSP from the chamber - after she refused to stop talking.
Sir David Steel rose to his feet and warned Johann Lamont, a back bench Labour MSP, that she would be ordered to leave after she failed to obey his instruction to end a question and sit down.
The rebuke led to a protracted row which dragged in speakers from almost every party and included accusations that Sir David was treating men and women differently.
The row blew up only hours after Sir David resumed full-time working after his ''successful'' treatment for prostate cancer.
Sir David, 64, who was diagnosed a year ago after a routine blood test, said his doctors were not using the words ''all clear'' because he had to return every three months for the next two years for check-ups.
He was presiding over the first minister's question time yesterday when Ms Lamont (Labour, Glasgow Pollok) came within seconds of being evicted.
The presiding officer stopped Ms Lamont while the MSP, who was heckled by mainly SNP MSPs, tried to ask a supplementary question on youth disorder to Jim Wallace, who was standing in for Jack McConnell, the first minister.
As her questions continued, Sir David, interrupted saying: ''No, no, no'' and ''enough''.
Ms Lamont then snapped: ''I'm sorry, I don't see why I should get held up for time, given the amount of time that's been given to other people.''
She called the issue ''very serious'' and continued with her speech at which point her microphone was switched off.
As Ms Lamont continued with her speech, albeit inaudibly, Sir David grew visibly angry and rose to his feet, for the first time since the parliament opened almost two years ago.
Waving a pen he said: ''The member must resume her seat or I will ask her to leave the chamber. Order, can I say if a member does that again they will be the first person asked to leave the chamber. That is not allowed.''
Ms Lamont, plainly enraged, then became involved in heated discussions with Labour colleagues as MSPs began a series of points of order.
Helen Eadie (Labour, Dunfermline East) suggested Sir David had a record of treating men and women MSPs
differently. She said: ''There is an issue, presiding officer, that in this chamber it is perceived by women in this house that you distinguish between men and women.''
This provoked howls of laughter and protest from opposition parties, including women MSPs.
Sir David rejected Ms Eadie's accusation as ''absolutely untrue''. He said parliamentary rules - the standing orders - made it quite clear supplementary questions had to be brief.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article