LOCAL authorities across the UK must be warned that their houses could be at risk from the collapse of disused limestone mines, an independent report into subsidence in Edinburgh that left 200 familes homeless warned yesterday.
The three-man inquiry team, headed by Paul Cullen QC, yesterday cleared council leaders of any blame following the collapse of the former mine workings under homes in Gilmerton in 2000 and last year.
However, the investigation team, which also included Robert Main, former head of building control at Aberdeen Council, and Professor Brian Mann, an expert in rock mechanics and mining from Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, said the incident highlighted the dramatic differences in practice between coal and limestone mining.
They called for other local authorities to be informed of the findings to prevent a similar occurrence.
Councils in Bath and Dudley which have identified former limestone workings in their area have already been in touch with the council to discuss and benefit from the information that has emerged.
The year-long inquiry found that consultants emphasised the decisions made by officials and councillors to build on the site had been reasonably made on the technological information available at the time.
Following subsidence at Hyvot's Bank primary school in 1978, which resulted in its demolition, the council had been fully aware of the abandoned limestone workings and of the need to take ''special precautions'' before building.
The team held that all ''reasonable precautions'' had since been taken as a result.
Reflecting on the publication of the findings, Mark Turley, director of housing with Edinburgh Council, said: ''The inquiry has concluded that, at the time these homes were built, engineers did not understand the potentially dramatic nature of collapsing limestone mine workings and tended to provide for the better understood nature of coal-mining subsidence.
''It would have been unreasonable to have expected the council or its contractors to have a better understanding of that technical issue than engineers generally.''
Welcoming the findings, Sheila Gilmore, executive member for housing with the council, said: ''Given the seriousness of the situation in Gilmerton, the council felt it was imperative for reasons of transparency and accountability that an independent inquiry be established.''
She said proposals to compensate owner-occupiers whose homes were affected were still to be examined.
''We are looking at whether we should assist home owners by paying a disturbance allowance to pay the excess needed to cover some insurance policies. Fortunately, all home owners were insured. Tenants were given a high-priority status for rehousing and also received a couple of thousand pounds in disturbance allowance and a home loss payment.''
The situation developed in November 2000 when large cracks appeared in a row of bungalows in the Ferniehill area of Gilmerton on the south side of Edinburgh. No-one was injured, but residents were evacuated and 33 properties were initially demolished.
Consultants Arup Scotland, engaged to assess the situation, quickly established that long-abandoned underground limestone mines were responsible. Their surveys prompted the evacuation and demolition of 189 households.
Other streets around the former quarry were identified as being at risk, prompting the council and Barratt, which was building new homes nearby, to fill in potentially risky voids with grout to provide additional support to the land.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article