Colonel Ruby Bradley, an army nurse who was one of America's most decorated female veterans and a Japanese prisoner of war, has died at age 94.
At a Japanese camp, Bradley went hungry and, giving most of her food to children being held captive. She and other nurses set up a clinic to care for the sick and wounded and to comfort the dying.
Speaking earlier this year she said she would never forget the night a US army tank crashed the camp's gates at the Santo Tomas Internment Camp in Manila, Philippines, freeing her after three years of captivity. ''We had heard rumours that American soldiers were close by,'' she said. ''Then, that tank came through. It was the best Saturday night performance I've ever seen.''
A native of Spencer, West
Virginia, Bradley became a nurse in 1933 after a stint as a teacher, and joined the Army Nurse Corps as a surgical nurse in 1934.
When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, she was a 34-year-old administrator serving in the Philippines at Camp John Hay. She was captured three weeks later.
Bradley was moved to Santo Tomas in Manila on September 23, 1943. She was among a group of imprisoned nurses known as the Angels in Fatigues. Not only did they provide medical treatment for prisoners, but they were adept at stashing food for the children. ''I was a pretty good thief,'' she once said. ''I would take food and put it in my pockets for the children.''
Bradley weighed about 80lbs when the American troops arrived on February 3, 1945. She said she never missed another meal.
For the next five years, Bradley enjoyed peace. Then came the Korean War, in which she worked as a combat nurse in evacuation hospitals.
In all, Bradley received 34 medals, including two Legion of Merit medals, two Bronze Stars, and the International Red Cross's prestigious nursing honour, the
Florence Nightingale Medal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article