SUCH has been the desperation of Celtic's season, certainly of the
latter part, that they are confronted with another of those
all-or-nothing matches. The Scottish Cup semi-final against Clydebank on
Saturday must be won if hope of salvaging something from the campaign is
not to die.
A tie against a team from the first division normally could be
approached by Celtic and their supporters in time-honoured fashion:
respectful noises about the merits of the opposition would be made while
thoughts of the Hampden final were kept in check. However, these are not
normal times for Celtic. Right now they are capable of losing to anyone.
At the end of recent matches manager Billy McNeill has looked agitated
and used words such as ''embarrassing'' and ''humiliating'' to describe
Celtic's work. But no-one present at the games against Rangers and St
Mirren needed to be told anything. They all know things are far from
well at Celtic Park.
They know also that McNeill has difficult decisions to make before the
semi-final against Clydebank. His team requires a shake-up, but he is
limited in his choice of personnel, particularly at the back.
It must have been especially frustrating for McNeill, who was the
club's finest ever central defender, to watch his defence haemorrhage so
severely in the games against Rangers and St Mirren, who were made to
look good, and that isn't always an easy thing to do. It is sadly ironic
that McNeill should now be facing the club's most crucial game of the
season without a central defender on whom he can trust totally.
His first choice, Paul Elliott, remains suspended because of an
appalling disciplinary record. He has been booked 15 times in a season
in which he did not start because he was injured. It is entirely fair to
say that the defender has been dealt with harshly at times, but it can
also be pointed out with some justification that his number of bookings
raises doubts about his poise and timing in the tackle.
At any rate, Celtic must soldier on without him and that presents
McNeill with a tricky problem. Steve McCahill, purchased from Dumbarton
last year, was tried last Saturday and did not acquit himself at all
well. The 23-year-old's misdirected passback presented St Mirren with
their second goal and throughout the match McCahill and Derek Whyte did
not look like a secure partnership.
Although McCahill will still believe in his own ability, and, who
knows, he might mature into a splendid defender in the next few years,
McNeill has to make up his mind whether or not to risk him in the semi
or re-arrange the team in some way to compensate better for the absence
of Elliott. The manager could bring back Anton Rogan, but that might be
an even greater gamble and is probably one which won't materialise.
There has been talk about about the displays in the reserves of Stuart
Balmer, a 20-year-old product of the Celtic Boys' Club system. He could
be on the verge of a breakthrough, but the importance of Saturday's game
might conspire against him.
There are problems in various parts of Celtic's make-up, but the
centre of defence is one which will claim a great deal of McNeill's
attention and one which highlights the club's current plight. It is a
sorry state of affairs that Celtic find themselves without an easily
identifiable defensive back-up.
The fact is they have not had a commanding centre half since McNeill
himself played. His last game was in the 74-75 Scottish Cup final and
while he went away to make himself a manager with Clyde and then
Aberdeen, the Parkhead side have had to make do mostly with jobbers at
the centre of their defence rather than players with an authoritative
presence.
Pat McCluskey was there for a while, and another sweeper, Pat Stanton,
whose career at Parkhead was brief, did a decent job, as did Johannes
Edvaldsson at No.5. Celtic then had Tom McAdam, Roddie McDonald, Roy
Aitken at various times, Mick McCarthy, and now Elliott.
None of these players came close to the standards set by McNeill and
it is peculiar that he finds his team short of a commanding sort of
player. His situation is similar to the one which faced John Greig when
he took over as manager of Rangers and found that the team suffered
because it was without his dominant influence.
There should be no doubt that Clydebank realise the frailties of this
current Celtic side, which is open to exploitation. If nerves have been
frayed enough by successive heavy defeats Celtic could be in serious
trouble.
A great responsibility will be on the shoulders of Paul McStay, who
will have to stamp his authority on the midfield from the beginning. He
must make things happen, thereby putting enough pressure on Clydebank to
disabuse them of any notions they may have concerning attack.
However, he will require help from others. Peter Grant can be relied
on to harry and tackle, Chris Morris, who is a fine player going
forward, and Dariusz Wdowczyk should be sound enough, but it is
difficult to be sure of everyone else.
The trouble with Celtic is that hardly anybody stands out. Mediocrity
envelops their club and even if they do retain the cup, much restoration
work will have to be done in the close season. McNeill requires several
players -- genuinely skilful players -- before his team can be strong
again.
Like his Ibrox counterpart, Graeme Souness, he purchased some who were
not up to the job and he must now ditch and try again. Souness sold off
those who did not suit and is about to claim another premier-division
championship, and it is now up to McNeill to think again.
It is not pleasant to say so, but it is extremely doubtful that
players like Mike Galloway, Tommy Coyne, Anton Rogan, and perhaps even
Andy Walker and John Hewitt will give the supporters the success they
deserve.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article