ORRIGHT Glasgow. A city's favourite musical sons last night made their
return from far-flung foreign exile (or South Queensferry anyway).
''Great to be back home,'' Jim Kerr told us. Glasgow went spare. First,
however, we witnessed the essentially Glaswegian Silences who work very
hard at being a speeded up Simple Minds. Durable, solid, Clyde-built, a
bit less than radical. Glasgow lapped it up.
Simple Minds initially functioned far too much as a slowed down
version of Simple Minds. On record they have of late abandoned cool
European inflections for couthy Celtic roots. Live, they were a bit of
nameless state at times, especially ponderous and platitudinous on their
newer material. Glasgow lapped it up nevertheless. Honorable fellows who
believe in the power of this rock thing to effect all manner of change
for good, the Minds seem now to be changing in reaction to a musical
agenda set by other pacesetters. Comparisons with the Waterboys and the
Proclaimers become increasingly invidious.
Intermittent Glasgow audience rapture oughtn't to blind Simple Minds
to their shortcomings, their lack of direction, their lack of real
control. Quieter quaisi-folkie bits with accordions and fiddles sit
strangely in a stadium setting; the transition from big urban rock to
small rural hoedown is a poor one to be forced to make.
The old edgy, slightly neurotic stuff buoyed things up, at the same
time highlighting the thinness of the new stuff. The mechanical Eurobeat
of Waterfront was particularly dandy but where to now, what's the point?
In a roundabout way Jim Kerr answered the question himself. ''If
anybody here is thinking of starting a rock 'n' roll band we've got a
message for you -- go for it,'' he shouted. I will, Jim, I will, with
Messrs Vega and Pop as my patron saints and ''stay mysterious, don't
preach and don't follow leaders,'' as my composite motto -- that and
''autodestruct after three seminal LPs.''
Glasgow is easily pleased. For their own long term good Simple Minds
shouldn't be.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article