JOHN McEnroe took possession of the Scottish Lawn Tennis Association's
championship trophy and almost immediately it fell to pieces in his
hands. These things happen to the enigmatic American. Accidents go
looking for him.
His performance in yesterday's final against Jimmy Connors, the
perfect climax to the Bank of Scotland Grasscourt Championships, was
beyond reproach until he lost control and the demons took over for a
brief spell in the second set. Bad words tripped out, but he bit his
tongue and was able again to channel his feelings towards beating
Connors.
It is testimony to the splendid, often awesome serve-and-volley games
of each player that there were no breaks of serve in the match which
McEnroe won 7-6, (7-2), 7-6 (7-4) in 1 hour 52 minutes. ''I hope all the
people out there realised what they were getting. That was good
tennis,'' Connors said later.
It was the first time these two had played one another since Montreal
two years ago, and since Connors, who will be 37 in September, says he
can take only one year at a time, it is likely that no other tennis
audience will see these two adversaries meet in a competitive final.
That in itself was worth the admission price of #18 a brief.
Craiglockhart's centre court was full for the first time in these
championships and the organisers, ProServ, were quick to take advantage
of the belated upsurge in interest. They introduced a grass pass which
allowed holders to sit on the bank above the south stand. A grass pass,
incidentally, also retailed at #18.
Who would have thought it, the citizens of Edinburgh parting with
bundles of greenbacks to sit on the grass. McEnroe and Connors packed up
their kitbags and headed towards the biggie, Wimbledon, unaware of the
breakthrough in traditional values their presence had achieved. Still,
as they went, both left ProServ, the sponsors, and the City of Edinburgh
picking through words of hope.
''I always try to defend titles and I'd like to come back,'' said
McEnroe, whose sentiments were echoed by Connors. Much may depend on
whether or not the tournament is granted grand-prix status, but as
Connors said, that's up to how hard the people involved are prepared to
push.
There is no doubt Craiglockhart is a splendid arena, particularly when
the sun is blazing. The tranquility, however, was disrupted when McEnroe
threw his racket -- the fourth time he had perpetrated such a
misdemeanor -- as Connors moved ahead 30-0 in the fifth game of the
second set. John Frame, an umpire from Penicuik, decided he would like
to be a hero, or a martyr, and he warned the top seed against racket
violation.
The man child in McEnroe resurfaced and Frame's ears picked up an
audible obscenity. The official docked McEnroe a point but still Junior
could not put a lid on his temper. Another colourful gem from the
McEnroe book of favourite quotations cost him that game.
He decided it was better not to test Frame further and everyone, the
organisers especially, no doubt, breathed sighs of relief. The umpire's
next demonstration of his authority would have been to disqualify the
eventual champion. McEnroe would have flown south in the huff but Frame
might have been placed in a different kind of chair, one that plugs into
the mains, next time he took a seat.
Fortunately, there were no other confrontations and McEnroe went on to
take a cheque for #14,000 and the glittering trophy on which his name
will be etched alongside such past luminaries as Ken Revie, Harry
Matheson and that would-be Conservative politician Buster Mottram.
As McEnroe took the crowd's applause Connors sat on the steps of the
umpire's chair staring into space. So this is where it all ends? No
chance. ''There's a tournament in London next week,'' he reminded
everyone.
The women's event also has a new champion, 17-year-old Mary Joe
Fernandez, who beat the defending champion, Gigi Fernandez, 6-2, 6-3, in
Saturday's final. Like McEnroe and Connors the women's finalists also
say they would like to return.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article