LOCKERBIE claimed the lives of 270 people. The tragedy has also
altered irrevocably the lives of many more, not least that of John Boyd,
the chief constable of Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary, who leaves
office and charge of the Lockerbie murder inquiry next week.
By nature self-effacing, Mr Boyd has answered detractors with deeds
and he walks out of the pressure cooker with dignity intact and his
stock riding high in the corridors of power here at home, in London,
Bonn, New York and Washington.
The criminal investigation which he has commanded has made great
strides. Unofficially, because of the entirely commendable requirement
in Scots law for total evidential integrity, there is now a case which
could be presented in court. Although the security of the Scottish end
of the investigation remains as unbreachable as ever, it is reasonable
to speculate from the leaked information from other capitals that there
are firm suspects.
John Boyd, who spoke this week to the Glasgow Herald, will bow out
with some regrets because he will leave with the book still open, the
case incomplete, the crime unresolved.
''But the policy has been laid down and when my successor walks in the
inquiry will continue on its well-oiled way,'' he said.
His own way takes him into the higher reaches of policing, inspecting
Scottish forces for efficiency, advising on improvements or innovations,
passing on his vast experience to other senior police managers and
directly to the Scottish Secretary.
And, one in the eye for the famously self-important English chief
constable, now retired but no less vocal, who said that international
intelligence services were unlikely to share their knowledge with a
local plod, John Boyd has, this week, been the honoured guest at
Bramshill, the English police senior staff college, where he lectured on
his experiences of the last six months. He has already done the same for
Scots superintendents at Tulliallan and leaves soon for Ottawa in what
is likely to be the start of an international round of teaching and
sharing.
Had Lockerbie never happened and had John Boyd retired on May 31 as he
had planned, he would have been able to reflect on a fine police career
marked by high professionalism. He has been a uniform foot soldier, a
detective, a planner, commander of a busy division in Glasgow, an
assistant chief constable in charge of all crime matters in Strathcylde
-- next to the Met, Britain's biggest force -- chairman of the Scottish
Secretary's crime prevention committee and president of the nation's
chief officers' association.
He admits his thoughts had already crossed the hill, that he was
looking ahead to the new challenge, at age 55, of the Inspectorate, when
death rained on the Scottish Borders at three minutes past seven on
December 21.
''When it happened there was a feeling of disbelief and shock which
was quickly replaced by the feeling that we could not look back. We had
to look forward, to respond in the most professional way possible yet do
so while having compassion for other people,'' he states.
Policemen who worked on the Lockerbie disaster aftermath and in the
subsequent harrowing inquiry have talked often about the support from
John Boyd's office. The door was always open.
''I was immediately in a position of great pressure. I laid down five
principles, five aims for the team to work to. The first was total
accuracy, the second the best co-ordination possible, the third was the
concrete priority of gathering in every shred of physical evidence from
the plane, the fourth involved the meticulous timing of the release of
information and the fifth was to ensure the proper diplomatic processes
were observed in all overseas enquiries.''
One effect of this structured approach, and the strict observance of
Scots law's requirement for prejudice-free evidence, is that the
standard of the case which will eventually be in the hands of the Lord
Advocate is such as to satisfy the evidential requirements of any other
country in the world. This may well prove vital.
Any one of the 21 countries who lost nationals in the explosion could
in theory prosecute if they secured the presence of a suspect on their
territory. There is a strong argument for such a prosecution to take
place in America, because of the presence of the death penalty.
The decision to hand over evidence and witnesses, and who and what to
hand over, would be taken by the Lord Advocate after discussions on the
requirements of the jurisdictions involved.
The fact that this willingness exists scotches the speculations of
strife between British, American and German police, intelligence
services and justice departments. The very presence of Scottish
officers, even now, in America and Germany has likewise ensured that
evidence gathered by the authorities there meets Scottish requirements
in law.
John Boyd says; ''Of course there were hiccoughs, but they were just
that and we handled them as they came up. These had to be kept in
perspective.''
Of the the flow of information, he says: ''It was very important that
we gave proper responses at the proper time. It was one of the
biggest-ever international disasters and the biggest international mass
murder. Had it only been the first we could have given everyone as much
information as they needed. It is still very important to keep the world
informed but we must always protect the integrity of the murder
inquiry.''
He insists that these pressures still exist but is just as adamant
that he will not respond to speculation, even if it is attributed to
American officials; ''It does nothing but fan the flames.''
There was intense pressure too from distressed relatives.
''Pan Am were flying people into Lockerbie -- brothers, sisters, aunts
and uncles -- but often they were not the next of kin. We had to be very
sympathetic but we had to resist the pressures to take shortcuts. I kept
thinking that whatever pressures I was under were nothing compared with
those on the relatives. Anyone who tried to hide behind a macho image in
a situation like that would do himself more harm than good.''
As far as the Americans were concerned, Lockerbie was not only a mass
murder but an assault on their nation, he believes, and their response
was natural.
''I can assure everyone that the Scottish police and the American
security services have worked and are still working well together. What
they do all the time, monitoring international terrorism, is of the
utmost importance, but you cannot take a case to court on intelligence.
You require hard evidence, whether it is circumstantial, forensic or
best evidence, that of witnesses. It would be foolish to say we would
not take as much advice and assistance from other agencies as we can but
we could not deal direct with intelligence agencies outside the UK --
there are diplomatic channels for that.''
He rejects the notion that the Scottish investigation is a waste of
time and resources and that the denouement will come in Damascus, or
Tripoli or Beruit.
''If you thought you might never reach a conclusion you might as well
shut up shop. A murder inquiry is a murder inquiry regardless of where
the suspect is. It is very wrong to get to the stage that we take it as
inevitable that if criminal atrocities happen on this scale we cannot
respond within the laws laid down, whether nationally or
internationally.
''We must never be panicked into coming out with wild speculations. We
must keep working hard at it. There are no shortcuts.''
What happened in his patch also knocks into a cocked hat the calls
from the English MP, John Wheeler, for new ''super forces'' to take us
into Europe and for a national disaster emergency force -- yet another
bee in Mr John Alderson's bonnet.
''When Dumfries and Galloway needed it most, mutual aid worked at its
best,'' he maintains.
''The facilities and the personnel we received from our bigger
neighbours allowed us to respond in the most professional way possible.
No praise can be high enough for the way officers responded, both as
policemen and as humans.
''Because we are a small force it is possible for the men to get
closer to the public than in urban areas. That relationship was
invaluable and must never be lost. The tripartite agreement -- the chief
constable, the local authority and the Scottish Office -- also works and
was shown to work.
''One of the important lessons is that if these things are ever to be
replaced then a great deal of thought must go into ensuring that these
relationships are not damaged.''
I kept thinking that whatever pressures I was under were nothing
compared with those on the relatives
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article