ABOUT five years ago the Association of Investment Trust Companies,
the umbrella organisation for investment trusts in the UK, joined forces
with the Glasgow Herald to stage an investment trust evening in Glasgow
at which several hundred readers turned up. Since then the event has
been repeated twice with equal success.
Marketing of investment trusts has made great strides forward since
these days, and now the AITC's efforts are being directed at financial
intermediaries as well as at private investors.
Financial intermediaries recommend investments to their clients, often
when large sums are available, such as from an early retirement or an
insurance policy maturing.
Such intermediaries have a wide range of investment vehicles to choose
from on behalf of their clients. Some are insurance linked, but often
unit trusts are proposed. Until recently it would be unlikely that an
independent High Street broker would direct his clients to investment
trust shares, however superior their performance.
Now all that is changing. How quickly may depend as much on the
investment trust themselves as on the independent intermediaries and
their clients.
Under the Financial Services Act, a broker should give his client the
best advice. In theory at least that means that he should not
discriminate between unit and investment trusts when making
recommendations to his clients. The AITC, backed by the superior
performance of investment trusts, is hot on this point, but if
intermediaries are to pick investment trusts they must develop an
expertise in this area.
Regularly monthly statistics are published by the AITC to measure the
performance of investment trusts, indicate areas of speciality, and give
details of important factors such as geographical spread and the
discount (or premium) to net asset value.
Most investment trusts do not have special arrangements to remunerate
intermediaries if they make purchases of their shares on behalf of
clients. Some groups have now recognised that this puts investment
trusts at a severe competitive disadvantage to unit trusts.
This problem was tackled first by Martin Currie when it launched its
investment trust savings plan in November 1987, immediately after Black
Monday. The scheme has been enormously successful not withstanding the
inauspicious timing of its launch.
The Martin Currie plan has been better marketed than most other
investment trust savings schemes, but its most notable feature was that
it made provision for the payment of commissions of up to 3%, to be paid
by the clients, to financial intermediaries in respect of lump sum
purchases.
Not everybody in the investment trust world welcomes this initiative,
but it was too good an idea to remain a Martin Currie monopoly.
Marketing is not always the strong point of investment trust houses,
but as they have diversified into unit trusts and pensions it has been
acknowledged at the very least as a necessary evil.
Across Charlotte Square from Martin Currie, Ivory and Sime became
increasingly anxious to build up private investor loyalty in its
investment trusts as a result of encountering major difficulties with
institutional investors over the reorganisation of a number of problem
trusts.
Down in London the largest firm of investment trust managers, Robert
Fleming, founded over 100 years ago by the Dundonian of that name, was
concerned, too, to make the most of its investment trusts and to market
them more effectively.
Because of the fixed capital nature of investment trusts they cannot
be sold off the page in the same way as unit trusts. Investment trust
savings schemes can be marketed because shares bought through them are
from the fixed pool and purchases are made through the Stock Market,
usually by the bank or other institution administering the scheme.
An investment trust, being a company, has to be careful that it is not
trapped into pushing its own shares in breach of companies legislation.
This means that if you participate in the Fleming investment trust
savings plan, through which the shares of 10 and shortly 11 investment
trusts can be bought, Robert Fleming cannot assist in choosing which
investment trusts suit your needs. For this an independent adviser is
required. Not everybody has a stockbroker, so Fleming wanted to involve
other financial intermediaries.
Earlier this year Fleming and
Ivory and Sime joined forces with Martin Currie to market their
investment trusts in collaboration and to offer financial intermediaries
up to 3% commission on lump sum purchases of investment trust shares.
This is exactly the same rate of commission as intermediaries can earn
from purchases of unit trusts, and puts the investment trusts offering
commission to intermediaries on a fully competitive basis with their
unit trust rivals.
The three groups who represent around 20% of the investment trust
industry staged a nationwide roadshow to explain their schemes to
intermediaries and to persuade them of the merits of their trusts.
Ivory and Sime took the opportunity to recast its existing savings
scheme. Now the 3% commission is applied to all lump sum investments
through the new savings scheme, but disposals of shares held through the
scheme are free of charge. Taking all costs into account, Ivory and Sime
believes that it has come up with arrangements for the round trip of
buying and selling which have a competitive edge on other types of
investment.
It is early days yet for the payment of commissions on investment
trust shares to financial intermediaries, but other investment trust
houses will be watching closely the results obtained by the Robert
Fleming, Ivory and Sime, Martin Currie triumvirate.
The contrary view expressed most cogently by Scottish American
Investment Trust, whose Saints saving scheme is one of the most
successful in the country, is that the whole investment business should
move away from commissions to fees for advice, as has been proposed by
the EC Commission.
In an ideal world there is much to be said for this, but the problem
is that fees are more visible than commissions even if the latter are
fully disclosed.
So unless the whole basis of conducting investment business is changed
by EC edict, it seems likely that the payment of commissions to
financial intermediaries will gain widespread acceptance among
investment trusts, just as savings schemes have done. If it results in
wider private investment in investment trust shares it will be a benefit
to the trusts themselves, the financial intermediaries and, most
important of all, their clients.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article