THE policeman who led the search for five-year-old Stephen McKerron
after the youngster disappeared from the Wonderwest World Holiday Centre
at Ayr yesterday described the lessons he had learned from the hunt.
At the second day of a fatal accident inquiry into the death of
Stephen, Chief Superintendent David Gall, Strathclyde police divisional
commander at Ayr, said he would now approach a search differently.
However he rejected criticisms of the hunt contained in an anonymous
letter delivered yesterday to Sheriff Neil Gow QC, who is conducting the
inquiry.
Chief Superintendent Gall gave details of the operation which covered
a two-mile radius around the holiday centre and extended along roads to
cover ground near lay-bys.
There was also a door-to-door check in the Doonfoot area of Ayr near
the holiday centre.
The boy went missing last September 17. His body was found 15 days
later. Mr Gall said that by 10.15am on September 18 police and a Royal
Navy helicopter had made a preliminary search covering a two-mile radius
around the centre.
This area was later painstakingly cross-checked. Coastguards and
holiday centre staff had by then searched beaches.
Asked what factors influenced his decision to restrict the main search
to two miles round Wonderwest World, Chief Superintendent Gall said he
weighed up information on Stephen.
Experts had told him there was a 92% probability that the child would
be found within 2.2 miles. The boy's body was found in a ditch by Lady
Margaret MacLehose 4.6 miles as the crow flies from the holiday complex.
Chief Superintendent Gall told the sheriff: ''If I had a similar
situation tomorrow I would clearly ensure that the search was wider.''
But without the knowledge gained from the search for Stepehen he said
he would have carried out an identical search again.
The sheriff put to the chief superintendent the contents of the
anonymous letter which dismissed the search as ''an expensive failure in
all respects''.
The writer said that every parent in the area would want to know why
no civilians, apart from hillwalkers, and no Territorial Army or Navy
personnel were allowed to help.
Chief Superintendent Gall told the sheriff that to his knowledge at
least 38 civilians were involved.
Detective Chief Superintendent John Fleming, 47, of Strathclyde CID,
told the inquiry that during the search he had enlisted the co-operation
of West Yorkshire police who provided a Holmes computer terminal at Ayr.
This enabled statements obtained in the search for Stephen to be
cross-checked against records of the search for missing girls Susan
Maxwell, Caroline Hogg and Sarah Jane Harper.
A total of 493 statements were taken. Exactly a week after Stephen
disappeared, 560 questionnaires were completed at road checks on the
Ayr-Dunure road.
Detective Chief Inspector Robert Redmond, of Ayr CID, told the sheriff
no-one had come forward to confirm any of the three reported sightings
of a man seen with a boy who could have been Stephen on the night the
child disappeared.
He said when Stephen was found the shoes he was wearing were tied with
double bow knots and there was a muddy sock in the boy's trouser
pockets.
Despite earlier evidence that Stephen could not tie his own laces,
Chief Inspector Redmond said he read nothing sinister into that.
The evidence suggested to him that the boy had got into mud, taken his
socks off, then slipped his tied shoes back on.
He said that there had been no apparent effort to conceal the body in
the ditch where it was found. There were about 1000 places in the
immediate area where a body could have been concealed and probably never
found.
Pathologist Dr Nancy Cunningham, who carried out a post mortem
examination, told the sheriff Stephen's death was due to exposure.
Asked by Sheriff Gow if she was happy to rule out the possibility of
strangulation, she said she could not rule that out because of the lack
of tissue on the partly decomposed body.
''All we can say is that there were not ligature marks on the back of
the neck,'' she said.
The inquiry closed and Sheriff Gow will give his findings on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article