ONE of Scotland's best-selling books of the year has been Bothy to Big
Ben, the autobiography of Ben Coutts, a kenspeckle figure in the world
of agriculture.
The book, published by Aberdeen University Press (at #6.95, in good
bookshops everywhere) is now in its third reprint in less than a year.
This is no surprise if the one small section forwarded to the Diary is
anything to go by.
It tells of a visit that Mr Coutts made to South Africa in 1964: ''It
was a quiet time of year and in the minibus there were only three
others, two ladies and a gentleman who had been to Cape Town on business
and was having a short break before returning to London. This chap
hadn't brought any booze, so I shared mine. On the second evening we
were listening to the news and it was announced that my good friend
George Mackie had won a by-election in Caithness for the Scottish
Liberals, which is my party.
''I was full of cheer and was pouring out drinks for all. Whereupon
the gentleman announced: 'My wife can't stand the Scottish Liberals or
Scotland and when she comes to power she'll see that they are soundly
defeated.' I said (this was 1964), 'It's the Scottish Nationalists who
are on the rise just now, not the Liberals. Anyway, who is your wife?'
'''Margaret Thatcher,' came the reply. Well, I'd never heard of
Margaret Thatcher and when I got back I asked Michael Noble who she was.
He told me and added: 'She and Ted Heath don't see eye to eye.'
Prophetic words indeed.''
Considering Mrs Thatcher's subsequent record on dealing with
rebellious Scots, it is easy to believe in the veracity of the author's
version . . . if it weren't for that reference to Dennis Thatcher
crossing the veldt without a tincture on his person.
Glasvegas reality
THE full details of the programme for Mayfest 1989 will be unleashed
next week, but there is one snippet from the brochure that the Diary
could not resist leaking in advance. Glasvegas, the Mayfest production
of Borderline Theatre, is described thus: ''A new musical play set in
the streets of Glasgow, where some are born great, some achieve
greatness and some are still throwing spears at buses . . .'' See
Glasgow, See Reality.
Toast to a snail
THERE will be considerable consumption of snails and ginger beer by
the Scottish legal fraternity next month.
The reason is the 60th anniversary of a famous Court of Session case
in which a Cambuslang woman sued a manufacturer of aerated waters (no
such thing as soft drinks in 1929). Mrs Mary Donoghue took to litigation
on the very reasonable grounds that the bottle of ginger beer which she
bought in a Paisley cafe to lace her ice cream contained a decomposing
snail.
Hardly earth-shattering stuff, you might think, but the best legal
brains in Scotland consider the case to be epoch-making, and who are we
to argue.
First into the ring celebration-wise is the Law Society of Scotland.
Law Society president Ross has instituted a search for descendants of
the parties involved in Donoghue versus Stevenson to invite them to a
special luncheon in Edinburgh on April 4, the anniversary of the day the
case was first recorded at the Court of Session.
Guests, including the daughter of Lord Atkins, the Judge concerned,
will be treated to a menu of dishes named after the dramatis personae
of the case. The Escargots a la Donoghue, the Diary is assured, are
not to be served in a ginger beer sauce.
The case of the snail and the ginger beer is also to be celebrated at
a cocktail party held in Glasgow a week later by the ancient and
prestigious legal firm of W. & J. Burness. The firm has no connection
with the case, apart, presumably from the number of Scottish litigants
encouraged to go to law by the consumer-friendly ruling by Lord Atkins.
The lawyers for the pursuer were W. & G. Leechman of Glasgow.
The Burness party invitation, in the shape of an old-fashioned stone
bottle, indicates that ''Snails and ginger beer will be served --
separately.'' These will take the form of ginger beer cocktails and
chocolate snails, possibly a more palatable way of celebrating legal
history.
Single women only
APHORISM of the Week comes from Maria Fyfe, Labour MP for Glasgow
Maryhill. Referring to the fact that in over 100 years of Scottish
Labour MPs only 10 of them have been women, she said: ''The Labour
movement in Scotland appears to welcome women MPs -- as long as it is
one at a time.''
An Honest Man
JIM SILLARS wants the world -- and in particular his Govan
constituents -- to know that he's an Ayr United supporter. Never even
darkened the doorstep of Ibrox stadium to see the Gers.
Political animal that he is, Sillars feels it necessary to lay his
soccer affinities on the line now that he has moved into new offices at
Edmiston House, formerly the Rangers social club, and just across the
way from the green, green grass of Ibrox. The landlord is Rangers
Football Development Club.
''In all these Glasgow matters I'm strictly neutral,'' he assures in
delicate reference to his constituents' Old Firm predilections. Even the
fact that Mr David Murray, the new owner of the Light Blues, is an
Ayrshire man like himself will not sway him.
The Diary can also give Mr Sillars the opportunity to nail a rumour
flying around that someone else is footing the bill for his new
two-office spread. Yes, Mr Sillars puts his earnings from The Sun
newspapers into the constituency kitty. No, his Murdoch money comes
nowhere near meeting the cost of the Ibrox office and three members of
staff.
Mr Sillars reckons it will cost him #12,000 over and above the #22,800
he gets as an MP to cover secretarial expenses -- which, as any
political activist will tell you, is a wheen of jumble sales.
''It's not a party political office,'' he emphasises. ''Anyone,
irrespective of how they voted, can feel free to come for advice.'' Even
Ayr United supporters.
Irish bull
WE have reported how broad Scots and Gaelic words are regularly
maltreated by computer spellcheck programs. The Irish, we hear, fare
no better. The word Eirann (as
in Telecom Eirann) produces the response ''Try urine'' or, just as bad
these days, ''Try Iran.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article