I have often recommended sparkling wines from the UK and the rest of the world over Champagne, purely on value for money. But as we head towards Christmas, it's time to dwell on just how good the real stuff is.
The fact that the top New World sparklers describe themselves as Method Champenois tells you that they all crave to be talked about in the same circles, and while it's true that there are many world class sparklers out there, if it's a really special occasion, don't be a scrooge.
It's the quality of the mousse in Champagne that really sets a good one aside. The bubbles should fizzle across your palate and burst so delicately that the flavours land on your palate so gently it's as if by magic. Quite why anyone rich or otherwise would want to waste that by spraying it around a room is anyone's guess.
Champers comes in many forms, dry, semi sweet, vintage and rose but my personal preference is for the Brut non vintage cuvées which are often assembled from a selection of cracking years. Expect flavours such as peaches, crisp apples and even almonds and cream. By the way, other than Tesco's always excellent own label, do expect to pay £40+ folks.
Cattier Brut Blanc de Blanc
One of my favourites but then I'm a Chardonnay tart. Clean crisp apple hints with a toasty palate and a medium to long finish. Quite sublime
Majestic £50 per bottle £45 mix 6
Pol Roger Brut Vintage
Pop the top of one of these and find your inner Churchill, folks. Floral and perhaps quite deceiving on the nose because the palate is far busier than you expect. Rich and buttery with a creamy texture. It's no wonder Winston loved it.
Waitrose £79
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here