Clairmont
Lesley McDowell
(Wildfire, £18.99)
The year of 1816 has been called “the year without a summer”. Following the eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia, sheets of rain swept across Europe and crops failed. Over this failed summer, Percy and Mary Shelley were famously ensconced in the Villa Diodati on the shores of Lake Geneva with Lord Byron and his friend John Polidori, their extended stay resulting in Mary Shelley’s landmark Gothic novel Frankenstein and Polidori’s The Vampyre.
One crucial member of their party, however, has been more or less written out of the story: Mary Shelley’s step-sister, Claire Clairmont.
Having set her heart on seducing Lord Byron back in England, the 18-year-old Claire had secured an introduction to him through Percy Shelley, and followed the Shelleys to Switzerland, where she and Byron resumed their brief, unequal affair. The summer that Frankenstein was conceived, Claire found she was pregnant with Byron’s child.
READ MORE:
'A novel of sex, siblings and the end of the world' - 10 new books to read this month
John Martyn: Graeme Thomson's Small Hours is a no-holds-barred story
An Ordinary Youth by Walter Kempowski is timely and terrifying
Happy to take sexual advantage of her when it suited him, the poet refused to be tied down by her, initially ignoring their daughter, Allegra, then placing her in a convent, where she died, aged five.
Lesley McDowell has already authored one novel inspired by a member of Mary Shelley’s circle, 2013’s Unfashioned Creatures, about her friend Isabella Baxter Booth. This latest argues that Claire Clairmont amounted to more than just her proximity to the Romantic poets.
The inescapable fact of her association with Byron, and the tragic death of their daughter, loomed over her for the rest of her days. But she lived on for another 60 years, and McDowell’s novel sets out to show that the remainder of her life was important too. Received wisdom tells us that women of the 19th Century needed a husband to support them, but Claire Clairmont was able to live out her days unmarried and independent, though not necessarily content.
McDowell’s depiction of the Romantic poets gathered in Villa Diodati, unsurprisingly, presents us with a pretty unhealthy scene: a bunch of unbearably self-absorbed, languid radicals espousing notions of free love while rarely seeming to display any genuine affection or concern for each other.
It’s hard to imagine this unstable group lasting had Shelley and Byron not suffered early deaths. Byron’s self-regard verges on the monstrous, but none is especially likeable, and that includes Claire herself. They set the tone for an eloquent, but muted and melancholy, novel.
McDowell interleaves scenes from Switzerland in 1816 with non-chronological slices of Claire’s later life. In 1825, she is a governess to a family in Russia, considering the romantic overtures of her tutor colleague and terrified that her past as a bohemian radical will come to light. By 1843, she is in Paris, living alone but attending salons and carrying on an affair with a much younger man.
The central thread throughout all of this is Claire’s turbulent relationship with step-sister Mary. After Shelley’s death, Mary ascends to the status of the famous widow of a revered poet, embracing respectability while raising their son, also called Percy.
Meanwhile, Claire, the unsung secret lover of another legendary poet, lives an itinerant life of transitory relationships on the continent. Tension and resentment simmer between them, not least when Mary tries to persuade Claire to surrender half of the bequest left to her by Shelley, on the grounds that she and Percy need it more.
For all that she’s headstrong, temperamental and nurses long-held grudges, Claire is sympathetically portrayed as a brave woman who never fulfilled her potential but battled on regardless. Lesley McDowell rescues her from the shadows of history and gives her the starring role she was denied in life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel