TO THE DOGS
Louise Welsh
(Canongate, £16.99)
How far should people go for their loved ones? At what point do parents stand back and let their offspring get what’s coming to them without trying to help?
That’s the dilemma facing Jim and Maggie Brennan. Their wayward son, Eliot, has been busted for drugs, and it looks like this time there will be no avoiding prison.
Jim and Maggie have always helped him out in the past, subbing him when he needed money, but the time has come, Jim decides, to institute a tough love regime. Eliot must learn to take responsibility for his own poor decisions.
READ MORE: New Year Honours 2024: Alexander McCall Smith knighted
Jim’s resolve wobbles, however, when he learns that Eliot owes drugs and cash to some ruthless people who have the means to inflict harm on him, even while he’s behind bars.
He figures he can help out by finding the money and the drugs and returning them to their owners.
But doing so will require him to get his hands dirty and reclaim a part of himself he thought he’d ditched long ago.
To the Dogs is a crime novel with a noticeable lack of police, sleuthing and action.
Instead, Welsh retreats from the front line of the fight against crime to focus on the loved ones who have to deal with the fallout; specifically, for a psychological and ethical examination of Jim Brennan, a professor of criminology who is in line to become principal of his university.
Jim’s father was a hard-drinking, abusive small-time gangster, and Jim did his best to leave that background behind, embracing books and learning as a means of escape and never looking back.
But now the ghosts of his past are lining up. He meets Cranston, a former pupil at his old school who has become a lawyer, and realises that Cranston might have the street-smarts and contacts for him to open up a dialogue with the gang that’s threatening his son.
But Eliot’s imprisonment isn’t the only dilemma in Jim’s life. While he’s trying to make deals with a criminal gang, his liberal conscience is pricked by the disappearance in Beijing of a former student, presumably snatched by the authorities – but where does he stand, politically, on the controversial bequest made to the university by a Saudi benefactor?
Should he allow his concerns for his son’s safety to influence which builder gets to construct a new uni building?
And how responsible should he feel for a student’s failure to get into Harvard because Jim apparently failed to send in a reference on time?
READ MORE: The Trials of Marjorie Crowe, by C.S. Robertson - dark and dangerous
The way Jim negotiates these moral mazes serves to illuminate his character. Raised with the values of a gangster, recognised by his wife-to-be as someone with “a willingness to go further than most men” and rescued by her from a life of drinking and brawling, Jim is starting to realise that the man he is now owes a lot more to his early upbringing than the persona he adopted to escape it.
If he has the nerve and resourcefulness to prevail, then his despised ne’er-do-well of a father must deserve some of the credit.
Although Jim’s interactions with his wife and younger child feel sketchier and more perfunctory than his walks on the wild side or his departmental strife, and the low-key ending feels a little anticlimactic, To the Dogs makes the effort to explore its protagonist in depth, with Welsh’s customary skill, and she subtly subverts the crime genre to use the plot not to expose who done it but to reveal who a man truly is.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here