Theatre Group Portrait in a Summer Landscape
Pitlochry Festival Theatre
Neil Cooper
Four stars
“But we can’t live as if we believed in nothing anymore!” John Michie’s world-weary academic, Rennie, implores, well into his cups in the second act of Peter Arnott’s new play. “We have to live at least as if we believed in something.”
Arnott’s self-styled attempt at Scottish Chekhov sees him gather his clans in a Perthshire country house on the eve of the 2014 Scottish independence referendum. And my, how civilised the world looks compared to the extremes thrown up in the decade since.
The occasion is Rennie’s retirement do, and he has a very special announcement for the focus group of Scotland’s liberal media and academic establishment in waiting who make up the guest list. These include his wife Edie, his London based art curator daughter Emma, Benny Young’s exiled actor Moon and Rennie’s former students Frank and Charlie, who have turned out very differently indeed.
Charlie is a TV populist, while Frank’s partner Kath is a youthful firebrand who has just found her first cause. Also present, if only spiritually, is Rennie and Edie’s son Will, a lost boy in a Nirvana t-shirt who rewinds everybody’s past by way of Pippa Murphy’s cut up soundscape to show off the baggage that haunts them.
David Greig’s stately production mixes up Arnott’s refreshingly well-made play with a more off-kilter style that fits the sense of its characters being stuck in a limboland between endings and beginnings. As Rennie, Michie is a battle scarred realist who has lost too much, with Deirdre Davis giving a heart rending turn as Edie. Patricia Panther’s Kath and Matthew Trevannion’s Charlie, meanwhile, are the absolutist flip sides of things to come.
Not quite a state of the nation play, this co-production between Pitlochry Festival Theatre and Edinburgh’s Royal Lyceum nevertheless taps into the complex, messed up humanity of the body politic. If the future remains unwritten, one wonders where Arnott’s characters are now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here