Still Game creators Greg Hemphill and Ford Kiernan have won a legal battle with Jack Daniel's over a whisky named after their beloved characters Jack and Victor.
The comedy duo launched a blended Scotch called Jack & Victor two years ago in honour of their pensioner alter egos in the hit BBC sitcom and it has proven a hit with fans.
They applied to register 'Jack & Victor' as a trademark for whisky and other drinks-related services to protect their brand.
However, lawyers for American whiskey giant Jack Daniel's opposed the application and said the name was too similar to their own.
The US firm claimed the Still Game whisky could mislead customers into thinking it was endorsed by them and said it would allow Hemphill and Kiernan to cash in on the worldwide fame of the Tennessee whiskey.
READ MORE: Drinks giant Pernod Ricard halts Scotch whisky exports to Russia
The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), who rule on trademark disputes, has now found in favour of 'Jack & Victor' and said the trademark can proceed to registration.
Both sides hired lawyers for a hearing at which Hemphill and Justin Welch, the managing director at Jack Daniel's, gave evidence.
Hemphill, 53, explained the popularity of Still Game, particularly in Scotland, and said the names Jack and Victor had become synonymous with it.
The UKIPO said the differences between the two brands were "too great" for there to be any confusion and found there was no evidence Hemphill and Kiernan were attempting to take advantage of Jack Daniel's reputation.
In a written ruling, UKIPO trademark hearing officer Heather Harrison said: "The opponent’s pleaded case is that the relevant public will believe that the contested mark is used by the opponent or by a party economically connected with or endorsed by the opponent.
"It further claims that use of the contested mark would constitute free-riding by the applicant on the reputation of the opponent.
"The first part of this pleading relies on the average consumer mistakenly believing that there is a trade connection between the users of the respective marks.
"Consequently, it is predicated on the existence of a likelihood of confusion, which is something that I have dismissed whether on the basis of the marks individually or as a family.
"Having reached that conclusion, I am bound to dismiss the first limb of the unfair advantage claim.
"As to free-riding, the evidence does not establish that there was any subjective intention to take unfair advantage.
"On the contrary, Mr Hemphill has given unchallenged evidence which explains in detail that the contested mark consists of the names of the protagonists in the Still Game television programme.
"That programme first aired between 2002 and 2007, returning to UK television for a further run of episodes between 2016 and 2019, to some renown, at least in Scotland."
READ MORE: Renowned Scotch goes to 'extraordinary lengths' to secure sherry-seasoned casks
She added: "The differences between 'JACK & VICTOR' and 'JACK DANIEL’S' are too great for the relevant public to believe that the contested goods are those of the opponent, despite the strong reputation of the earlier sign, even for identical goods.
"Similarly, although 'JACK' is replicated in the later mark, it has a lesser reputation and the relevant public is unlikely to be deceived into thinking that use of the combination 'JACK & VICTOR' indicates that the goods are those of the opponent.
"Any similarity attributed to the use of 'JACK' in the opponent’s marks, singly or as a group, will not result in the mistaken belief that the contested mark is a further development of the opponent’s brands."
After losing the case, Jack Daniel's were ordered to pay £3,200 in costs to Jack and Victor Limited, the company used by Hemphill and Kiernan to market their product.
Jack Daniel's has registered trademarks in the UK for terms including 'Jack Daniel's', 'Jack' and 'Gentleman Jack'.
Still Game became a comedy phenomenon after making its TV debut in 2002.
When it returned in 2016 after a nine year hiatus, it became the most-watched TV programme in over a decade in Scotland attracting more than half of the viewing audience.
The ninth and final series aired in 2019 and its creators have ruled out bringing it back.
Jack Daniel's declined to comment on the case.
Greg Hemphill said: "We are pleased with this ruling and that common sense has prevailed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel